ArticleArthroplasty today2024
Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Persian Version of the Harris Hip Score.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of modified ERAS protocol implementation on length of stay and complications in elderly hip fracture patients: a before-and-after study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Harris hip score (HHS), a self-administered questionnaire, is widely used to evaluate hip pathology affecting health-related quality of life and physical function. This study's purpose was HHS translation to Persian (HHS-Pr) and validation in patients with different hip pathologies. Methods: Translation and cultural adaptation followed existing guidelines. Hip pathology patients (n = 151) completed the HHS, 12-Item Health Survey, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). Criterion validity was determined from comparisons between the HHS measures and the different corresponding WOMAC domains. Internal consistency used Cronbach's alpha (α), content validity the "content validity index," and floor/ceiling effect the end-range 15%. Test-retest reliability used the intraclass correlation coefficient (subsample n = 30) at 3-7 days that compared baseline with a repeated measure. Measurement precision and change sensitivity used longitudinal assessment (subgroup n = 30) from the standard error of the measurement and minimal detectable change. Results: Cross-cultural adaptation required minor wording changes. The mean HHS-Pr was 57.77 ± 19.69. Criterion validity was significant with the WOMAC (r = -0.76) and 12-Item Health Survey Physical Component Summary (r = 0.47). Internal consistency was high before (α = 0.75) and after standardization (α = 0.86). Content validity was satisfactory (content validity index = 0.88). No floor/ceiling effects were found. Test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.85) was excellent, as was standard error of the measurement (raw score = 5.8) and minimal detectable change (raw score = 11.4). Conclusions: The HHS-Pr demonstrated adequate validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change. These psychometric properties sufficiently measure functional status in patients with hip pathologies in a Persian-speaking population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.