ArticleHeliyon2024
Investigating knowledge of DRLs, image quality and radiation dose in PET/CT and CT imaging among medical imaging professionals.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiographers' Paediatric CT Radiation Dose Consideration: A Quantitative Study at Hospitals in Urban South Africa.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2026Article
- Approaches to Computed Tomography Education for Radiography Students.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2026Review
- Computed Tomography Diagnostic Reference Levels Worldwide and in Jordan: Implications for Patient Dose Reduction.Drug, healthcare and patient safety · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the knowledge of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs), image quality, radiation dose and protocol parameters among Jordanian medical imaging professionals (MIPs) involved in PET/CT and CT scan procedures. Materials and methods: A questionnaire was designed and distributed to MIPs in Jordan. The survey comprised four sections: demographic data, MIP knowledge on dose/protocol parameters, image quality, and DRLs. Statistical analyses were performed utilizing Pearson's correlation, t-tests, ANOVA, and linear regression, with a significance level of 95 % and a p-value threshold of <0.05. Results: The study involved 147 participants. Most respondents were male (76.2 %), and most were aged 26-35 years (44.2 %). Approximately 51 % held a bachelor's degree, and the most common range of experience was 3-5 years (28.6 %). Participants showed a moderate level of knowledge regarding dose and protocol parameters, with a mean score of 61.8 %. The mean scores for knowledge of image quality and DRLs were 45.2 % and 44.8 %, respectively. The age group of the MIPs and the total experience were found to have a significant impact on the knowledge of the dose and protocol parameters, as well as the DRLs. Additionally, experience was found to have a significant influence on knowledge of the dose and protocol parameters. The study revealed a positive and significant effect of MIPs' knowledge of dose/protocol parameters and image quality on their knowledge of DRLs. Conclusions: This study indicates that professionals across five specialties who are engaged in PET/CT and CT imaging possess a moderate understanding of dosage and protocol parameters. However, there is a notable gap in knowledge regarding DRLs and image quality. To address this issue, it is recommended that MIPs actively engage in educational programs emphasizing exposure parameters and their impact on image quality. Additionally, access to comprehensive education and training programs will enable MIPs to grasp the complexities of DRLs and their implications, facilitating their implementation in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.