ArticleHeliyon2024
Machine learning deciphers the significance of mitochondrial regulators on the diagnosis and subtype classification in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- An Artificial Intelligence Pipeline for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Data to Treatment Recommendations.International journal of general medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a highly prevalent liver disease worldwide and lack of research on the diagnostic utility of mitochondrial regulators in NAFLD. Mitochondrial dysfunction plays a pivotal role in the development and progression of NAFLD, especially oxidative stress and acidity β-oxidative overload. Thus, we aimed to identify and validate a panel of mitochondrial gene expression biomarkers for detection of NAFLD. Methods: We selected the GSE89632 dataset and identified key mitochondrial regulators by intersecting DEGs, WGCNA modules, and MRGs. Classification of NAFLD subtypes based on these key mitochondrial regulatory factors was performed, and the pattern of immune system infiltration in different NAFLD subtypes were also investigated. RF, LASSO, and SVM-RFE were employed to identify possible diagnostic biomarkers from key mitochondrial regulatory factors and the predictive power was demonstrated through ROC curves. Finally, we validated these potential diagnostic biomarkers in human peripheral blood samples and a high-fat diet-induced NAFLD mouse model. Results: We identified 25 key regulators of mitochondria and two NAFLD subtypes with different immune infiltration patterns. Four potential diagnostic biomarkers (BCL2L11, NAGS, HDHD3, and RMND1) were screened by three machine learning methods thereby establishing the diagnostic model, which showed favorable predictive power and achieved significant clinical benefit at certain threshold probabilities. Then, through internal and external validation, we identified and confirmed that BCL2L11 was significantly downregulated in NAFLD, while the other three were significantly upregulated. Conclusion: The four MRGs, namely BCL2L11, NAGS, HDHD3, and RMND1, are novel potential biomarkers for diagnosing NAFLD. A diagnostic model constructed using the four MRGs may aid early diagnosis of NAFLD in clinics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.