Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38707407›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Straw pyrolysis for use in electricity storage installations.

Jerzy Chojnacki, Jan Kielar, Jan Najser, Jaroslav Frantík, Tomáš Najser, Marcel Mikeska, Błażej Gaze, Bernard Knutel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jerzy ChojnackiVSB-Technical University of Ostrava, CEET, ENET Centre, 17. Listopadu 15, 708 00, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic.
Jan KielarVSB-Technical University of Ostrava, CEET, ENET Centre, 17. Listopadu 15, 708 00, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic.
Jan NajserVSB-Technical University of Ostrava, CEET, ENET Centre, 17. Listopadu 15, 708 00, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic.
Jaroslav FrantíkVSB-Technical University of Ostrava, CEET, ENET Centre, 17. Listopadu 15, 708 00, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic.
Tomáš NajserVSB-Technical University of Ostrava, CEET, ENET Centre, 17. Listopadu 15, 708 00, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic.
Marcel MikeskaVSB-Technical University of Ostrava, CEET, ENET Centre, 17. Listopadu 15, 708 00, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic.
Błażej GazeInstitute of Agricultural Engineering, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 51-630, Wroclaw, Chełmońskiego 37a, Poland.
Bernard KnutelInstitute of Agricultural Engineering, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 51-630, Wroclaw, Chełmońskiego 37a, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A concept has been proposed for an installation designed to store excess electricity periodically occurring on the grid. Excess electricity will be used for straw pyrolysis. The main pyrolysis product, gas, will be used to generate electricity using a combustion generator to feed back power into the grid during periods of shortage. The resulting biochar from the pyrolysis can be introduced into the soil to improve soil quality and play a significant role in carbon sequestration. The system uses an electrically heated reactor with a screw conveyor. To preliminarily assess the feasibility of this system, experiments were carried out using wheat straw at temperatures of 300, 400, 500, 600, and 700 °C for the pyrolysis reactor. The resulting gas-to-feedstock mass ratio ranged from 29.04 % at 300 °C to 52.7 % at 700 °C reactor temperature, the biochar mass yield ratio to feedstock varied from 39.41 % to 27.36 % (at 700 °C), and the pyrolysis liquid ranged from 31.55 % to 27.36 % (at 700 °C). The pyrolytic liquid contained a high water content relative to its mass, reaching up to 95.2 % at 700 °C, rendering it less suitable as an energy feedstock. At a reactor temperature of 700 °C, the energy value of the gas produced from the feedstock was twice that of the electricity used for the pyrolysis process. These results suggest the feasibility and operation of the proposed installation.

Indexed as

BiocharCarbon sequestrationElectricity storage installationEnergy balancePyrolysis productsStraw

Identifiers

PMID38707407
PMCPMC11066651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.