ArticleHeliyon2024
Straw pyrolysis for use in electricity storage installations.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A concept has been proposed for an installation designed to store excess electricity periodically occurring on the grid. Excess electricity will be used for straw pyrolysis. The main pyrolysis product, gas, will be used to generate electricity using a combustion generator to feed back power into the grid during periods of shortage. The resulting biochar from the pyrolysis can be introduced into the soil to improve soil quality and play a significant role in carbon sequestration. The system uses an electrically heated reactor with a screw conveyor. To preliminarily assess the feasibility of this system, experiments were carried out using wheat straw at temperatures of 300, 400, 500, 600, and 700 °C for the pyrolysis reactor. The resulting gas-to-feedstock mass ratio ranged from 29.04 % at 300 °C to 52.7 % at 700 °C reactor temperature, the biochar mass yield ratio to feedstock varied from 39.41 % to 27.36 % (at 700 °C), and the pyrolysis liquid ranged from 31.55 % to 27.36 % (at 700 °C). The pyrolytic liquid contained a high water content relative to its mass, reaching up to 95.2 % at 700 °C, rendering it less suitable as an energy feedstock. At a reactor temperature of 700 °C, the energy value of the gas produced from the feedstock was twice that of the electricity used for the pyrolysis process. These results suggest the feasibility and operation of the proposed installation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.