ArticleHeliyon2024
Landslide susceptibility assessment using deep learning considering unbalanced samples distribution.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Landslide susceptibility assessment (LSA) is fundamental for managing landslide geological disasters. This study presents a deep learning approach (DNN-MSFM) designed to enhance LSA modeling, particularly addressing limitations caused by the unbalanced distribution of data samples in applied datasets. DNN-MSFM approach combines a deep neural network (DNN) and a mean squared false misclassification loss function (MSFM) to handle unbalanced samples from the algorithmic perspective. The model's performance was evaluated on an unbalanced dataset containing mapping units' records of 293 landslide samples and 653 non-landslide samples from the Baota District, China. Its effectiveness was assessed through statistical metrics and compared against DNN and Support Vector Machine (SVM) basic models. The results demonstrated a significant performance enhancement from the DNN-MSFM (OverallAccuracy = 0.889 and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.84), indicating its effectiveness in learning the underlying landslide susceptibility features and demonstrating its ability to provide improved predictions even in areas with unbalanced landslide samples. Moreover, the study emphasizes the importance of considering balanced loss functions in training DNN under various imbalance degrees and contributes to expanding the applicability of DNN in LSA modeling. Also, this study builds a foundation for further enhancements of deep learning methods for geological disaster assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.