ArticleHeliyon2024
Sex disparity in clinical characteristics and long-term prognosis after liver resection for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in survival outcomes among patients under 65 years with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a SEER analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Establishment of a prognostic nomogram for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients receiving chemotherapy: a SEER-based study.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Application of machine learning models to explore prognosis and cause of death in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients undergoing chemotherapy.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Sex-related disparities in outcomes of survival in biliary tract cancer patients.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Overexpression of proteasome 26S subunit non-ATPase 6 protein and its clinicopathological significance in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.World journal of hepatology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To compare the survival outcomes between male and female patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who underwent liver resection. Methods: Data from 976 consecutive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients undergoing liver resection between January 2005 and May 2013 at the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. Patient clinicopathological characteristics, overall survival, and cumulative recurrence rates were compared between male and female patients using propensity score matching. Results: Propensity score matching generated 313 matched pairs of patients. Among the entire cohort, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival and recurrence rates of the male and female patients were 60.2 %, 37.3 %, and 27.7 % vs. 65.8 %, 40.4 %, and 31.0 % ( Conclusion: Male sex was an independent risk factor for overall survival and tumor recurrence in patients after liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.