ReviewHeliyon2024
An overview of challenges associated with exosomal miRNA isolation toward liquid biopsy-based ovarian cancer detection.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a miRNA-based prognostic model for high-grade serous ovarian cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- Potential Role of Exosomes in the Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Ovarian Cancer.Cancers · 2026Review
- An integrated microfluidic system for automatic and self-validated analysis of cervical extracellular vesicle markers PD-L1 and ERBB3.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2026Article
- Nanomaterial-based total analysis systems for isolation and detection of exosomal biomarkers in cancer diagnosis.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Exosomal microRNAs in colorectal cancer communication networks: implications for metastasis, therapy resistance, and precision medicine.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Crosstalk between microRNA and oxidative stress in ovarian cancer: diagnosis, pathogenesis and therapeutic resistance.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Emerging technologies and clinical translation of urine-based liquid biopsy in urological cancers.Genes & genomics · 2025Review
- Exosomal MicroRNA: Diagnostic Potential and Role in Breast Cancer Dissemination.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Age-Related Oral and Para-Oral Tissue Disorders: The Evolving Therapeutic and Diagnostic Potential of Exosomes.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Review
- From biomolecules to breakthroughs: exosomes as next-generation theranostics in female infertility.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As one of the deadliest gynaecological cancers, ovarian cancer has been on the list. With lesser-known symptoms and lack of an accurate detection method, it is still difficult to catch it early. In terms of both the diagnosis and outlook for cancer, liquid biopsy has come a long way with significant advancements. Exosomes, extracellular components commonly shed by cancerous cells, are nucleic acid-rich particles floating in almost all body fluids and hold enormous promise, leading to minimallyinvasive molecular diagnostics. They have been shown as potential biomarkers in liquid biopsy, being implicated in tumour growth and metastasis. In order to address the drawbacks of ovarian cancer tumor heterogeneity, a liquid biopsy-based approach is being investigated by detecting cell-free nucleic acids, particularly non-coding RNAs, having the advantage of being less invasive and more prominent in nature. microRNAs are known to actively contribute to cancer development and their existence inside exosomes has also been made quite apparent which can be leveraged to diagnose and treat the disease. Extraction of miRNAs and exosomes is an arduous execution, and while other approaches have been investigated, none have produced results that are as encouraging due to limits in time commitment, yield, and, most significantly, damage to the exosomal structure resulting discrepancies in miRNA-based expression profiling for disease diagnosis. We have briefly outlined and reviewed the difficulties with exosome isolation techniques and the need for their standardization. The several widely used procedures and their drawbacks in terms of the exosomal purity they may produce have also been outlined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.