ArticleJournal of pain research2024
Effectiveness of Different Noninvasive Physiotherapy in Relieving Postlaparoscopic Shoulder pain: A Protocol for Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of Nonpharmacological Interventions in Acute Postoperative Pain of Patients with Lung Cancer Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Protocol for Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of Non-Pharmacological Interventions on Postoperative Pain in Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and NMA Protocol.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Breaking the Pain Cycle: Hydroflotation With Promethazine and Dexamethasone for Post-laparoscopic Shoulder Pain.Cureus · 2025Article
- Research progress on post-laparoscopic shoulder pain after gynecologic surgery.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Shoulder pain is one of the most common symptoms after laparoscopic surgery, which seriously affects people's health and quality of life. Many clinical studies have shown that noninvasive physiotherapy is the most beneficial treatment for patients, but the best approach for various noninvasive physiotherapy is unclear. The purpose of this study protocol is to compare the effectiveness of different noninvasive physiotherapy in relieving postlaparoscopic shoulder pain (PLSP). Methods: We will search ten electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases from their inception to November 2023. We will select randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effectiveness of noninvasive physiotherapy on PLSP. Our primary outcome will be to measure the intensity of shoulder pain at 24 and 48 hours after the end of the noninvasive intervention in the included study. Secondary outcomes include incidence of shoulder pain at 24 and 48 hours, postoperative nausea / vomiting and incidence of other complications after noninvasive intervention. Then, standard network meta-analysis will be conducted using Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 18. Results: Our systematic review and network meta-analysis will identify the best noninvasive physiotherapy for PLSP patients. Conclusion: This systematic review will address the existing knowledge gap regarding best practice for relieving PLSP with noninvasive physiotherapy. The results of this network meta-analysis will help medical staff and patients choose the best method to relieve the PLSP. Furthermore, we hope that the results of this study will provide evidence-based for the improvement of guidelines and facilitate the decision sharing process. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42023481829.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.