Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38707233›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2024

Prognostic factors of conversion surgery for stage IV gastric cancer: A multi-institutional retrospective analysis.

Atsushi Takeno, Masaaki Motoori, Kentaro Kishi, Takeshi Omori, Motohiro Hirao, Toru Masuzawa, Kazumasa Fujitani, Kazuyoshi Yamamato, Yukinori Kurokawa, Yuichiro Doki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Atsushi TakenoDepartment of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2003-2942
Masaaki MotooriDepartment of Surgery Osaka General Medical Center Osaka Japan.
Kentaro KishiDepartment of Surgery Osaka Police Hospital Osaka Japan.
Takeshi OmoriDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Osaka International Cancer Institute Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5495-6516
Motohiro HiraoDepartment of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital Osaka Japan.
Toru MasuzawaDepartment of Surgery Kansai Rosai Hospital Amagasaki Hyogo Japan.
Kazumasa FujitaniDepartment of Surgery Osaka General Medical Center Osaka Japan.
Kazuyoshi YamamatoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine Osaka University Suita Osaka Japan.
Yukinori KurokawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine Osaka University Suita Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2883-0132
Yuichiro DokiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine Osaka University Suita Osaka Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Conversion surgery (CS) is a highly anticipated strategy for stage IV advanced gastric cancer (AGC) with a good response to chemotherapy. However, prognostic factors limiting R0 resection remain unclear. In this multi-institutional study, we investigated the clinical outcomes of CS for stage IV AGC and the prognostic factors of CS-limiting R0 resection and analyzed them according to metastatic patterns. Methods: Clinical data on 210 patients who underwent CS for stage IV AGC at six institutions between 2007 and 2017 were retrospectively retrieved. The patient background, preoperative treatment, operative outcomes, and survival times were recorded. Prognostic factors for overall and recurrence-free survival were investigated using univariate and multivariate analyses for patients who underwent R0 resection. Results: R0 resection was achieved in 146 (70%) patients. The median survival time was 32 months, and the 3-year survival rate was 45%. Patients who achieved R0 resection had significantly longer survival than those with R1/2 resection (median survival time: 41.5 months vs. 20.7 months). Multivariate analysis identified pathological N positivity for overall and relapse-free survival and pathological T4 for relapse-free survival as significant independent poor prognostic factors of R0 resected patients. There was no significant difference in survival among the peritoneum, liver, and lymph node groups regarding the initial metastatic sites. Conclusions: CS with R0 resection for patients with stage IV AGC can lead to longer survival. Patients with pathological T4 and pathological N positivity were eligible for intensive adjuvant therapy after CS with R0 resection.

Indexed as

conversion surgerygastric cancerprognostic factorR0 resectionstage IV

Identifiers

PMID38707233
PMCPMC11066490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.