ArticleCureus2024
Antimicrobial Resistance Profile in ICU Patients Across India: A Multicenter, Retrospective, Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Escalating threat of multidrug-resistant bacteria: Insights from a low-middle income country setting.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
- Prevalence and molecular characterization of colistin-resistant gram-negative bacteria from a tertiary care hospital in Eastern India.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (RAST): A Quick Guide to Bacterial Sepsis Management.Cureus · 2026Article
- Multidrug resistance, biofilm formation, and genetic determinants in diabetic foot infections from Uttar Pradesh, India: a clinical-microbiological insight from a prospective study.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Article
- Increased Antimicrobial Consumption, Isolation Rate, and Resistance Profiles of Multi-Drug ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Antimicrobials in serious illness and end-of-life care: lifting the veil of silence.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2025Review
- Epidemiology and Clinical Outcome of Common Multi-drug Resistant Gram-negative Bacterial Infections in a Network of Hospitals in India (IMPRES): A Multicenter Intensive Care Unit-based Prospective Clinical Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025Article
- Prevalence of azithromycin resistance after the COVID-19 era in clinical bacterial isolates from a tertiary care hospital in Gurugram, India.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Antibiogram and Antibiotic Resistance Patterns in Bacterial Isolates from Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The pattern of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) changes with time and varies in countries and between hospitals within the same country. Physicians might thus benefit from information on regional resistance patterns of clinically significant bacterial isolates when deciding on the best empirical treatment. Numerous nosocomial infections are caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains, notably methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains, which are also linked to higher morbidity and death. Aim Evaluation of AMR profile in intensive care unit (ICU) patients of multiple tertiary care centers across India. Methods This was a multicenter, retrospective study based on electronic laboratory records of microbial isolates from clinical specimens from ICUs analyzed at microbiology laboratories of identified hospitals. Data of invasive sample records was collected from Microbiology labs of the identified hospitals within India and were aligned to WHO 5 Net standard reporting and as per Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI-2014) Guidelines for assessment. Data from 21556 samples were collected retrospectively from December 2021 to January 2010. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was done by using both the Kirby Baur disk diffusion method and the automated method (using the Vitek 2 compact system) as per CLSI (2014) guidelines. Results Of 21,556 enrolled patients, the majority (54.12%) were males and adults (62.07%). The median age was 58 years. Of 815 gram-positive bacteria reports, the commonest were S. aureus (552, 67.73%), Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (107, 13.13%), and Enterococcus spp. (105, 12.88%). For Coagulase-negative Staphylococci-positive samples, resistance was to penicillin (79, 73.83%), and erythromycin (73, 68.22%); and for S. aureus was to ciprofloxacin (361, 65.4%), and erythromycin (315,57.07%). Enterococcus spp. showed maximum resistance to erythromycin (73, 69.52%), followed by ampicillin, ciprofloxacin (68,64.76% each). Of 4,183 gram-negative bacteria reports, the commonest were Klebsiella pneumoniae (1,531, 36.6%), Escherichia coli (1,269, 30.34%), and Acinetobacter spp. (589, 14.08%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (438, 14.08%), other Klebsiella spp. (174, 4.16%) and Enterobacter spp. (161, 3.85%). K. pneumoniae showed resistance to ciprofloxacin (1,001, 65.38%). E. coli showed resistance to ampicillin (918, 72.34%), and ciprofloxacin (798,62.88%); and Acinetobacter spp. to ceftazidime (525, 89.13%), and ciprofloxacin (507, 86.08%), while P. aeruginosa showed resistance to imipenem (234, 53.42%). Enterobacter spp. showed resistance to cefotaxime (129, 80.12%). MRSA samples showed resistance to phenoxymethylpenicillin (188, 35.54%) and benzylpenicillin (178, 33.46%). Conclusion Gram-negative bacteria were more common than gram-positive bacteria in causing antibiotic-resistant infections in ICU, with beta-lactams, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, and cephalosporins showing varied percentages of resistance. Fluoroquinolones, macrolides, and penicillin were noted to be highly resistant against gram-positive species. This indicates that evaluation based on MDR and antibiotic consumption patterns is imperative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.