ArticleCureus2024
Laparoscopic-Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy With Dense Bladder Adhesions and Absent Cervix: A Case Report With a Descriptive Video of the Entire Procedure.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hysterectomy is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures in the United States. Hysterectomy for benign gynecological reasons can be performed through several approaches: abdominal, laparoscopic, laparoscopically assisted vaginal, robotic-assisted, and vaginal natural orifice hysterectomy. The choice of approach is strongly influenced by factors such as previous procedures, safety, and recovery process. Currently, vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH), assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and robotic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy are considered minimally invasive approaches with multiple benefits to the patient such as less trauma, shorter operative time, and shorter postoperative period. However, in patients with pelvic adhesions, adhesions within the abdominal cavity, especially omental adhesions to the abdominal wall, and adhesions between the uterus and the bladder caused by multiple cesarian sections or prior surgery on the cervix, these minimally invasive approaches are problematic. In this report, we describe in detail our approach to LAVH in a patient with severe abdominal adhesions and an absent cervix. We believe that our approach is safe and relatively fast compared to an open abdominal procedure and, therefore, it may help gynecologic surgeons-in-training nationwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.