ArticleCureus2024
In Vitro Comparison of Optical Properties Between Single-Shade and Conventional Composite Resin Restorations.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Color Match of Single-Shade Versus Multi-Shade Resin Composites: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2025Pooled it
- Do modeling liquid and glycerin gel compromise the color stability of one-shade composites.Odontology · 2026Article
- Color Matching Ability of a Single-Shade or Multi-Shade Composite Used for Lithium Disilicate Restoration Repair: Influence of Background and Shade.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- The in vitro effect of electronic versus conventional cigarettes on color stability and surface roughness of dental resin composites.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Shrinkage, Degree of Conversion, Water Sorption and Solubility, and Mechanical Properties of Novel One-Shade Universal Composite.Polymers · 2025Article
- Chameleon Effect of Universal Shade Composite Polymers in Repairing CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparison of Color Stability of a Monochromatic Resin Versus Bulk-Fill and Micro-Hybrid Resins.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe recently developed single-shade composite resin (using the concept of structural coloring) is a promising option to eliminate the process and subjectivity of shade selection. However, current evidence of its performance is still insufficient. This study aimed to evaluate the color matching, color stability, and refractive index (RI) of single-shade restorations compared with conventional composite resin.
methodsThis in vitro study was conducted on 48 extracted maxillary premolars. The teeth were sorted into three tooth shade groups (B2, A3, and A3.5). Each group included two subgroups based on the materials used: Omnichroma (OM; Tokuyama Dental, Tokyo, Japan) and Filtek Z350 (FT; 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA). Buccal and lingual Class V round cavities were prepared and restored according to the randomly assigned subgroups, with the test single-shade material (OM) on one surface and the matching conventional control material (FT) of the proper shade on the other surface of each tooth. Color matching was evaluated by visual assessment and a spectrophotometer. All specimens were distributed into four staining groups and immersed in various staining beverages (black coffee, Arabic coffee, Coca-Cola, and distilled water) for four weeks. Color changes were assessed using a spectrophotometer. Four groups of disc-shaped specimens (single-shade, B2, A3, and A3.5) were fabricated to evaluate the RI using a refractometer. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the materials.
resultsThe mean value of the color difference (ΔE) of single-shade restorations was significantly higher than that of paired conventional restorations in all shade groups. The highest mean ΔE was in subgroup A3.5-OM (8.84 ± 2.39) and showed significantly less color matching than other OM subgroups (p=0.009). The visual assessment showed comparable and acceptable color matching in all subgroups except A3.5-OM (p=0.006). There was a significant color change after the staining test within and across staining groups, but the color change was comparable between the OM and FT subgroups. The RI of single-shade material was significantly higher than conventional material (p<0.05).
conclusionThe color matching of single-shade restorations was affected by tooth shade. Its color stability was influenced by various staining substances but was similar to conventional restorations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.