ArticleCureus2024
Thoracic Ultrasound Utility in Pulmonary Pathologies Following Blunt Chest Trauma: A Cross-Sectional Study From Barcelona, Venezuela.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The thoracic ultrasound (TUS) is a monitoring tool that has gained worldwide popularity in various scenarios, offering the opportunity for dynamic, bedside evaluations. Recent studies indicate that the use of TUS enables the diagnosis of pathologies resulting from blunt chest trauma (BCT), yielding favorable outcomes. This study aimed to compare the utility of TUS versus chest radiography (CXR) in diagnosing pulmonary pathologies resulting from closed-chest traumas. Methodology A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of 58 patients diagnosed with BCT who sought emergency care at the "Dr. Luis Razetti" University Hospital in Barcelona, Venezuela, from November 2023 to January 2024. Results Of the patients, 75.9% (n = 44) were male, with an average age of 37.8 years (standard deviation = 18.4 years). Injuries were reported in 8.6% (n = 5) of the patients, including 60% (n = 3) pneumothorax and 40% (n = 2) hemothorax. Ultrasound results coincided with CXR in 94.8% (n = 55) of the cases, with a Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.9 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.642-1.0). TUS demonstrated higher sensitivity than CXR (100% vs. 60%) for detecting hemothorax and pneumothorax in patients with BCT, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.991 (95% CI = 0.968-1.013). Conclusions BCT predominantly occurred in young males, resulting primarily in pneumothorax and hemothorax lesions, detectable with higher sensitivity through TUS compared to CXR. The use of TUS should be considered an essential component of the initial assessment for individuals with BCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.