ArticleCureus2024
Exploring the Impact of Nickel Exposure on Female Fertility.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Infertility affects an estimated 186 million individuals globally and is associated with numerous mental health issues. Trace elements are essential for reproductive health, yet the role of nickel in female fertility is not well understood. Previous research has shown conflicting evidence regarding nickel's impact on ovarian function and its potential to disrupt reproductive processes. Methods We utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) focusing on a cohort of 7,839 women, with an emphasis on 1,404 women aged 18 to 35. Logistic regression was employed to investigate the relationship between urinary nickel levels and fertility status, controlling for age, BMI, and race/ethnicity. Results The fertility analysis included 880 fertile and 106 infertile women, identifying age as a significant predictor of fertility status. Nickel exposure did not demonstrate a statistically significant association with fertility. The racial distribution within the groups showed a higher proportion of non-Hispanic White women in the fertile category and Mexican American women in the infertile group, although race was not a significant predictor in the regression model. Conclusions We found no significant relationship between nickel exposure and fertility status when adjusted for race, BMI, and age. Age was the only significant factor associated with fertility. These results highlight the complexity of the interplay between environmental exposures and reproductive health, suggesting that further research is necessary to elucidate the role of nickel and other trace elements in fertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.