Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38706953›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Culturally adapted cognitive assessment tool for Indigenous communities in Brazil: Content, construct, and criterion validity.

Camila Carlos Bezerra, Noeli das Neves Toledo, Diego Ferreira da Silva, Fernanda Carini da Silva, Vanessa Vasconcellos Duarte, Sonia Maria Dozzi Brucki, Dina Lo Giudice, Luciana Mascarenhas Fonseca, Juliana Nery Souza-Talarico

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The landscape of dementia research, diagnosis, treatment, and care in Latin America.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Review
  3. Advancing brain health equity with Indigenous peoples: A critical imperative.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Camila Carlos BezerraDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing School of Nursing University of São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5896-5604
Noeli das Neves ToledoSchool of Nursing at Manaus Federal University of Amazonas Manaus Brazil.
Diego Ferreira da SilvaDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing School of Nursing University of São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.
Fernanda Carini da SilvaDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing School of Nursing University of São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.
Vanessa Vasconcellos DuarteSchool of Nursing at Manaus Federal University of Amazonas Manaus Brazil.
Sonia Maria Dozzi BruckiDepartment of Neurology Faculty of Medicine University of São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.
Dina Lo GiudiceNational Ageing Research Institute Ltd, Parkville, Victoria Australia Royal Melbourne Hospital Royal Park Campus Parkville Victoria Australia.
Luciana Mascarenhas FonsecaDepartment of Community and Behavioral Health Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine Washington State University Pullman Washington USA.
Juliana Nery Souza-TalaricoCollege of Nursing University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInitial dementia prevalence estimates have revealed a significant burden of the disease in Indigenous communities in Amazonas, Brazil. However, the need for culturally adapted cognitive tools poses a critical challenge when assessing cognitive performance in these communities. This study addressed this issue by culturally adapting and providing validity indicators for the Brazilian Indigenous Cognitive Assessment (BRICA) tool in Manaus, Brazil's urban multiethnic Indigenous community.

methodsUsing a three-stage process and a stakeholder-engaged approach, the BRICA tool was culturally adapted in an urban multiethnic Indigenous community from Manaus, Brazil. The content validity index (CVI) examined inter-rater concordance between experts, while criterion and concurrent validity were performed using diagnostic consensus criteria in 141 Indigenous participants aged ≥ 50 years.

resultsFindings showed evidence of content validity in terms of equivalence aspects (scale CVI [S-CVI] 0.93) and relevance ratings (S-CVI 0.85) between expert panels. The identified cut-off score of ≤ 33/39 on the BRICA demonstrated a sensitivity of 94.4%, specificity of 99.2%, positive predictive value of 94.4%, and negative predictive value of 99.2% for dementia diagnosis. DISCUSSION: Using a stakeholder-engaged approach, we culturally adapted the BRICA tool for a Brazilian urban multiethnic Indigenous community. This comprehensive adaptation process resulted in favorable indicators of content, construct, and criteria validity for the BRICA tool. By addressing the existing bias in cognitive assessment within Indigenous communities, the BRICA tool represents a noteworthy breakthrough. Its implementation exhibits potential for improving the early detection and management of dementia among Indigenous groups. Highlights: Culturally sensitive tools are essential to assess cognition in Indigenous populations.An expert panel and stakeholders' perspectives were incorporated to design the Brazilian Indigenous Cognitive Assessment (BRICA) tool.A cognitive screening tool was adapted and validated using a stakeholder approach.BRICA is the first culturally sensitive cognitive tool for urban Brazilian Indigenous individuals.

Indexed as

cognitive assessmentdementiaIndigenous

Identifiers

PMID38706953
PMCPMC11066414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.