Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38706920›Full record

ArticleMaterials letters2023

Optimization of the Modular Reinforced Bone Scaffold for Customized Alveolar Bone Defects.

Meisam Omidi, Luis E Almeida, Lobat Tayebi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Meisam OmidiMarquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI 53233, USA.
Luis E AlmeidaMarquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI 53233, USA.
Lobat TayebiMarquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI 53233, USA.

Funding

Supplement: Development of an Integrated 3D Human Osteo-Mucosal ModelR15DE027533 · NIDCR · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI TAYEBI, LOBAT · 2018 to 2021
$816k
Vascularization of critical-sized craniomaxillofacial defectsR56DE029191 · NIDCR · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI TAYEBI, LOBAT · 2021 to 2021
$363k
NIDCR NIH HHS R15 DE027533NIDCR NIH HHS R56 DE029191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A modular reinforced bone scaffold with enhanced mechanical properties has recently been developed by our group. It includes: 1) A load-bearing module: a skeleton which is made of a slowly degradable material, undertaking mechanical necessities of the scaffold, and 2) A bioreactive module: a porous and biodegradable component undertaking biological necessities of the scaffold. The load-bearing module is placed into the bio-reactive module to reinforce it. This paper is dedicated to optimizing the load-bearing module for a certain customized alveolar bone defect. More specifically, a 3D-printed skeleton, made of polycaprolactone (PCL), is optimized based on the boundary conditions of the defect shape using the finite element method (FEM) to minimize the weight (to minimize the amount of PCL) and maximize the mechanical properties and porosity of the skeleton. Gelatin foam has been incorporated into the optimized skeleton through the aminolysis process to form the bio-reactive module. The mechanical characterization confirmed that the optimized load-bearing module has a bridge-like shape and can significantly improve the mechanical properties of the scaffold. Also, in vitro studies showed that the Revised manuscript (clean version) Click here to view linked References fabricated scaffold can improve cell proliferation and osteogenesis. This kind of scaffold can be useful for the treatment of critical-sized defects.

Indexed as

Alveolar DefectsBone ScaffoldLoadbearing ScaffoldModular ScaffoldReinforced Scaffold

Identifiers

PMID38706920
PMCPMC11067888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.