Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38706757›Full record

ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2024

World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow's Milk Allergy (DRACMA) guideline update - XII - Recommendations on milk formula supplements with and without probiotics for infants and toddlers with CMA.

Antonio Bognanni, Alessandro Fiocchi, Stefania Arasi, Derek K Chu, Ignacio Ansotegui, Amal H Assa'ad, Sami L Bahna, Roberto Berni Canani, Martin Bozzola, Lamia Dahdah and 29 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Term infant formula macronutrient composition: An update for clinicians.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. The evolution of nutritional care in children with food allergies - With a focus on cow's milk allergy.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

39 authors.

Antonio BognanniDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Alessandro FiocchiTranslational Research in Pediatric Specialties Area, Division of Allergy, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza Sant'Onofrio, 4, Rome 00165, Italy.
Stefania ArasiTranslational Research in Pediatric Specialties Area, Division of Allergy, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza Sant'Onofrio, 4, Rome 00165, Italy.
Derek K ChuDepartment of Medicine, Evidence in Allergy Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Ignacio AnsoteguiHospital Quironsalud Bizkaia, Bilbao-Erandio, Spain.
Amal H Assa'adDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Sami L BahnaAllergy and Immunology Section, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA.
Roberto Berni CananiPediatric Allergy Program at the Department of Translational Medical Science, and ImmunoNutritionLab at Ceinge Advanced Biotechnologies, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Martin BozzolaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Lamia DahdahTranslational Research in Pediatric Specialties Area, Division of Allergy, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza Sant'Onofrio, 4, Rome 00165, Italy.
Christophe DupontParis Descartes University, Pediatric Gastroenterology, Necker Hospital, Paris, France.
Piotr DziechciarzDepartment of Paediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Motohiro EbisawaClinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization, Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Ramon T FirminoFaculty of Medical Sciences of Campina Grande, UNIFACISA University Centre, Campina Grande, Paraiba, Brazil.
Alexandro ChuDepartment of Medicine, Evidence in Allergy Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Elena GalliPediatric Allergy Unit, San Pietro Hospital - Fatebenefratelli, Rome, Italy.
Andrea HorvathDepartment of Paediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Rose KamenwaDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Gideon LackKing's College London, Asthma-UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Department of Pediatric Allergy, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Haiqi LiDepartment of Primary Child Care, Children's Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, China.
Alberto MartelliMember of Italian Society of Allergy and Pediatric Immunology (SIAIP), Italy.
Anna Nowak-WęgrzynDepartment of Pediatrics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Hassenfeld Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Nikolaos G PapadopoulosDivision of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Ruby PawankarDivision of Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Yetiani RoldanDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Maria SaidAllergy & Anaphylaxis Australia, Castle Hill, New South Wales, Australia.
Mario Sánchez-BorgesAllergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Centro Médico Docente La Trinidad and Clínica El Avila, Caracas, Venezuela.
Raanan ShamirInstitute for Gastroenterology, Nutrition and Liver Diseases, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Jonathan M SpergelDivision of Allergy and Immunology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Hania SzajewskaDepartment of Paediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Luigi TerraccianoPediatric Primary Care, National Pediatric Health Care System, Milan, Italy.
Yvan VandenplasDepartment of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Carina VenterSection of Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Siw WaffenschmidtDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Susan WasermanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Amena WarnerAllergy UK, London, England, UK.
Gary W K WongDepartment of Paediatrics, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Holger J SchünemannDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Jan L BrozekDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cow's milk allergy (CMA) is the most common food allergy in infants. The replacement with specialized formulas is an established clinical approach to ensure adequate growth and minimize the risk of severe allergic reactions when breastfeeding is not possible. Still, given the availability of multiple options, such as extensively hydrolyzed cow's milk protein formula (eHF-CM), amino acid formula (AAF), hydrolyzed rice formula (HRF) and soy formulas (SF), there is some uncertainty as to the most suitable choice with respect to health outcomes. Furthermore, the addition of probiotics to a formula has been proposed as a potential approach to maximize benefit. Objective: These evidence-based guidelines from the World Allergy Organization (WAO) intend to support patients, clinicians, and others in decisions about the use of milk specialized formulas, with and without probiotics, for individuals with CMA. Methods: WAO formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to include the views of all stakeholders and to minimize potential biases from competing interests. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline-development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, which were subject to review by stakeholders. Results: After reviewing the summarized evidence and thoroughly discussing the different management options, the WAO guideline panel suggests: a) using an extensively hydrolyzed (cow's milk) formula or a hydrolyzed rice formula as the first option for managing infants with immunoglobulin E (IgE) and non-IgE-mediated CMA who are not being breastfed. An amino-acid formula or a soy formula could be regarded as second and third options respectively; b) using either a formula without a probiotic or a casein-based extensively hydrolyzed formula containing Conclusions: If breastfeeding is not available, clinicians, patients, and their family members might want to discuss all the potential desirable and undesirable consequences of each formula in infants with CMA, integrating them with the patients' and caregivers' values and preferences, local availability, and cost, before deciding on a treatment option. We also suggest what research is needed to determine with greater certainty which formulas are likely to be the most beneficial, cost-effective, and equitable.

Indexed as

Clinical practice guidelinesGRADEMilk allergyMilk replacement formulasProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID38706757
PMCPMC11068951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.