ArticleEJIFCC2024
Optimization of the Diagnostic Capacity of Traditional Biomarkers in Muscle Damage and Its Use in the Diagnosis of Dermatomyositis and Polymyositis.
Article in EJIFCC, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND-
aimCreatine kinase (CK) and aldolase are markers traditionally used in the study of muscle damage (MD). As CK determination is more specific to muscle damage, the demand for both determinations in routine laboratory tests would entail an extra cost.
methodsRetrospective observational study conducted between 2019-2020. CK and aldolase concentrations from 218 patients were studied.ROC curves were analyzed for CK and aldolase for muscle damage detection. Cut-off values were selected for both strategies. Specifity of CK and aldolase for dermatomyositis or polymyositis diagnosis in our population was studied using the McNemar's test.
resultsThe area under the ROC curve (AUC) for total CK was 0.716 (95%CI: 0.651-0.775), for CK in males it was 0.703 (95%CI: 0.592-0.799), and for CK in females was 0.719 (95%CI: 0.636-0.793). For aldolase, AUC was 0.505 (95%CI: 0.437-0.573). Optimized cut-off points for each determination were: 112 U/L for CK in men, with a sensitivity of 73.9% (95%CI: 51.6-89.8) and a specificity of 49.2% (95%CI: 35.9-62.5); 88 U/L for CK in women, with a sensitivity of 75.0% (95%CI: 57.8-87.9) and specificity of 50.5% (95%CI: 40.4-60.6); and 5.6 U/L for aldolase, with a sensitivity of 61.0% (95%CI: 53.2-68.8) and a specificity of 38.8% (95%CI: 26.5-52.6).Regarding the individuals diagnosed with dermatomyositis or polymyositis, 66.7% and 44.4% of them were correctly classified as pathological by CK and aldolase results, respectively. McNemar's test did not reveal significant differences.
conclusionThe determination of CK offers a better diagnostic performance of MD and, in addition, does not present significant differences regarding the determination of aldolase in cases of polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Therefore, the single determination of CK would be sufficient for MD screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38706738PMC11063786What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.