Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38706734›Full record

ReviewEJIFCC2024

Utilizing Data Analytics And Business Intelligence Tools In Laboratory Workflow.

Ibrahim Mansoor, Farhan Javed Dar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EJIFCC, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ibrahim MansoorConsultant Pathology, Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine & Blood Bank. International Medical Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Farhan Javed DarConsultant Clinical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine & Blood Bank. International Medical Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A business intelligence (BI) tool in a laboratory workflow offers various benefits, including data consolidation, real-time monitoring, process optimization, cost analysis, performance benchmarking (quality indicators), predictive analytics, compliance reporting, and decision support. These tools improve operational efficiency, quality control, inventory management, cost analysis, and clinical decision-making. This write up reveals the workflow process and implementation of BI in a private hospital laboratory. By identifying challenges and overcoming them, laboratories can utilize the power of BI and analytics solutions to accelerate healthcare performance, lower costs, and improve care quality. We used navify (Viewics) as a BI platform which relies on an infinity data warehouse for analytics and dashboards. We applied it for pre-analytic, analytic and post-analytic phases in laboratory. We conclude, digitalization is crucial for innovation and competitiveness, enhancing productivity, efficiency, and flexibility in future laboratories.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingBig DataBusinessData AnalyticQuality Indicators

Identifiers

PMID38706734
PMCPMC11063783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.