Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38706717›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognition2024

Just-in-Time Encoding Into Visual Working Memory Is Contingent Upon Constant Availability of External Information.

Alex J Hoogerbrugge, Christoph Strauch, Sanne Böing, Tanja C W Nijboer, Stefan Van der Stigchel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alex J HoogerbruggeExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2859-5128
Christoph StrauchExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6380-8635
Sanne BöingExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2410-8708
Tanja C W NijboerExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6683-0267
Stefan Van der StigchelExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5918-3521

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans maintain an intricate balance between storing information in visual working memory (VWM) and just-in-time sampling of the external world, rooted in a trade-off between the cost of maintaining items in VWM versus retrieving information as it is needed. Previous studies have consistently shown that one prerequisite of just-in-time sampling is a high degree of availability of external information, and that introducing a delay before being able to access information led participants to rely less on the external world and more on VWM. However, these studies manipulated availability in such a manner that the cost of sampling was stable and predictable. It is yet unclear whether participants become less reliant on external information when it is more difficult to factor in the cost of sampling that information. In two experiments, participants copied an example layout from the left to the right side of the screen. In Experiment 1, intermittent occlusion of the example layout led participants to attempt to encode more items per inspection than when the layout was constantly available, but this did not consistently result in more correct placements. However, these findings could potentially be explained by inherent differences in how long the example layout could be viewed. Therefore in Experiment 2, the example layout only became available after a gaze-contingent delay, which could be constant or variable. Here, the introduction of any delay led to increased VWM load compared to no delay, although the degree of variability in the delay did not alter behaviour. These results reaffirm that the nature of when we engage VWM is dynamical, and suggest that any disruption to the continuous availability of external information is the main driver of increased VWM usage relative to whether availability is predictable or not.

Indexed as

Copying taskExternal samplingEye movementsTrade-offVisual Working Memory

Identifiers

PMID38706717
PMCPMC11067970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.