ArticleWorld neurosurgery: X2024
Three-dimensional fusion imaging to assess apposition of low-profile visualized intraluminal support stent for intracranial aneurysm coiling.
Article in World neurosurgery: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety and hemodynamic efficacy of the LVIS stent in the endovascular treatment of intracranial wide-necked aneurysms: a single-center retrospective study.Chinese neurosurgical journal · 2026Article
- High-Resolution C-arm Computed Tomography for Evaluation of Stent Expansion and Apposition after Intracranial Stent Implantation.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate on three-dimensional (3D) fusion images the apposition of low-profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) stents in intracranial aneurysms after treatment and assess inter-rater reliability. Materials and methods: Records of all patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms who were treated with the LVIS stent were retrospectively accessed and included in this study. Two neurosurgeons evaluated the presence of malapposition between the vessel walls and the stent trunk (crescent sign) and the vessel wall and the stent edges (edge malappostion) on 3D fusion images. These images were high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography images of the LVIS stent fused with 3D-digital subtraction angiography images of the vessels. Associations between malapposition and aneurysm location were assessed by Fisher's exact test, and inter-rater agreement was estimated using Cohen's kappa statistic. Results: Forty consecutive patients were included. In all patients, 3D fusion imaging successfully visualized the tantalum helical strands and the closed-cell structure of the nitinol material of the low-profile visualized intraluminal support. A crescent sign was observed in 27.5 % and edge malapposition in 47.5 % of the patients. Malapposition was not significantly associated with location ( Conclusions: 3D fusion imaging provided clear visualization of the LVIS stent and parent arteries, and could detect malapposition with excellent inter-rater reliability. This technique may provide valuable guidance for surgeons in determining postoperative management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.