Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38706683›Full record

ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2024

The surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures 2010-2019: United States national case volume and incidence trends.

Hayden L Cooke, Andrew M Gabig, Anthony L Karzon, Zaamin B Hussain, Akinade A Ojemakinde, Eric R Wagner, Michael B Gottschalk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Influence of allograft augmentation on surgical outcomes and complications in proximal humerus fractures: a matched-pair analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hayden L CookeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Andrew M GabigDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Anthony L KarzonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Zaamin B HussainDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Akinade A OjemakindeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Eric R WagnerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Michael B GottschalkDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Proximal humerus fractures are the third most common fracture type for patients between the ages of 65 and 89 and occur more frequently in women than men. Given the variety of surgical treatments for proximal humerus fractures, the aim of this study was to (1) report United States national volume and incidence estimates for surgical management of proximal humerus fractures to better understand the changing practice over the past decade and (2) to analyze differences in volume and incidence among age groups, sex, and geographic region. Methods: Using IBM Marketscan national database, all patients that underwent open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), hemiarthroplasty, or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) between 2010 and 2019 were identified with Current Procedural Terminology codes. The dataset was further stratified to identify patients treated for proximal humerus fractures. IBM Marketscan provided discharge weights that were used to determine estimated national annual volumes of each procedure in IBM SPSS Statistics software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Volume and incidence were adjusted per 1,000,000 persons and calculated for subgroups according to age group, sex, and geographical region. The United States Census Bureau annual population data was used for all incidence calculations. Results: Over the past decade, the total volume and incidence of surgically treated proximal humerus fractures increased by 13% and 5%, respectively. Although overall incidence decreased, ORIF remained the most common surgical treatment. The greatest decrease in volume and incidence of ORIF occurred in patients ≥75. The incidence of ORIF treatment increased in the South and West while it decreased in the Northeast and Midwest. Total volume and incidence of HA decreased between 2010 and 2019 and this trend remained among all subgroups. Total volume and incidence of RTSA increased by over 300%. The incidence of males and females receiving RTSA increased by 266% and 320%, respectively. Volume and incidence of RTSA increased across all age groups. Volume and incidence of RTSA increased in the Midwest, South, and Western regions while it remained unchanged in the Northeast. Conclusion: Surgical management trends of proximal humerus fractures have changed greatly over the past decade. ORIF remains the most common surgical treatment for proximal humerus fractures. HA has fallen out of favor while RTSA has seen significant increases in usage across sex, age groups, and geographic regions. These trends represent a change in practice for treating proximal humerus fractures by considering all patient and fracture characteristics when opting for surgical management.

Indexed as

20102019IncidenceManagementProximal humerus fractureSurgicalVolume

Identifiers

PMID38706683
PMCPMC11065663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.