Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38706661›Full record

ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2024

Optimizing pectoralis major tendon repair: a modified knotless suture anchor technique using high-strength suture and tape.

Pratchaya Manop, Pinkawas Kongmalai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pratchaya ManopDepartment of Orthopedics, Phra Nang Klao Hospital, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Pinkawas KongmalaiDepartment of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rupture of the pectoralis major (PM) tendon is infrequent but has shown an increased incidence in athletes, particularly weightlifters during bench presses. Various techniques for repair exist, yet no established gold standard has been defined. Methods: We present a modified surgical technique utilizing knotless suture anchors for PM tendon repair. The technique involves bringing the tendon end superiorly and inferiorly to the decorticated bone surface, ensuring broader tendon-to-bone contact. Knotless anchors with a unique suture locking mechanism facilitate tension adjustment. Additionally, the repair's strength is reinforced by employing both surgical tape and high-strength suture. Results: The utilization of both surgical tape and high-strength suture in conjunction with knotless suture anchors provides a secure and stable construct. This approach minimizes the risk of failure, reduces the potential for neurovascular injury associated with bicortical drilling, preserves imaging quality due to the absence of metal artifacts, and helps avoid the risk of fracture associated with traditional methods. However, surgeons should be aware of a potential disadvantage of increased surgical costs compared to traditional techniques. Conclusion: Our modified technique offers multiple advantages, including increased tendon-to-bone contact, enhanced stability, reduced neurovascular risks, and avoidance of potential fractures. This makes it a valuable option for successful PM tendon repairs. Surgeons should consider its benefits and weigh them against the associated costs for optimal patient care.

Indexed as

FiberTapeFiberWireKnotless suture anchorNeurovascular injuryPectoralis major tendonRuptureSurgical technique

Identifiers

PMID38706661
PMCPMC11065742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.