Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38706636›Full record

Trial reportClinical interventions in aging2024

Is Shock Wave Application Effective on Various Chronic Wounds in the Geriatric Population? Preliminary Clinical Study.

Robert Dymarek, Izabela Kuberka, Karolina Walewicz, Jakub Taradaj, Joanna Rosińczuk, Mirosław Sopel

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical interventions in aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Robert DymarekDepartment of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2806-1775
Izabela KuberkaDivision of Anaesthetic and Surgical Nursing, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Karolina WalewiczMedical Institute, Jan Grodek State University in Sanok, Sanok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4272-8978
Jakub TaradajInstitute of Physiotherapy and Health Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1796-5832
Joanna RosińczukDivision of Internal Medicine Nursing, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Mirosław SopelFaculty of Medicine, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9851-2423

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is a beneficial adjunct modality for chronic wounds. Limited research has been conducted on pressure ulcers (PUs), while the majority of studies have focused on diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and venous leg ulcers (VLUs). This study aimed to evaluate the short-term effects of radial ESWT in older adults with chronic wounds. Patients and Methods: This study involved a total of 31 wounds: PUs (n=22), VLUs (n=7), and DFUs (n=2). A single radial ESWT was performed with 300 + 100 shocks per cm Results: A significant wound decrease in planimetry was noted (pre-ESWT vs post-ESWT), with wound area from 9.4 cm Conclusion: The ESWT application yields substantial immediate clinical effects that support the healing of chronic wounds in older adults. Even a single ESWT session can prove to be clinically effective and beneficial in the management of chronic wounds.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Shockwave TherapyPressure UlcerWound HealingAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseDiabetic FootFemaleHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeVaricose Ulcerclinical assessmentdiabetic foot ulcerextracorporeal shockwave therapyolder adultspressure ulcervenous ulcerwound healing

Identifiers

PMID38706636
PMCPMC11069372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.