ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2024
Evaluation of the precision and accuracy in the classification of breast histopathology images using the MobileNetV3 model.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based automated detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma in histopathological images: a comparative study of five CNN architectures.Odontology · 2026Article
- Vision transformer-based diagnosis of psoriasis and eczema in whole-slide histology.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Article
- Explainable deep learning ensemble framework for accurate classification of wild poisonous mushroom species.BMC biotechnology · 2025Article
- A Lightweight Cross-Gated Dual-Branch Attention Network for Colon and Lung Cancer Diagnosis from Histopathological Images.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Transforming Healthcare: Artificial Intelligence (AI) Applications in Medical Imaging and Drug Response Prediction.Genome integrity · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate surgical pathological assessment of breast biopsies is essential to the proper management of breast lesions. Identifying histological features, such as nuclear pleomorphism, increased mitotic activity, cellular atypia, patterns of architectural disruption, as well as invasion through basement membranes into surrounding stroma and normal structures, including invasion of vascular and lymphatic spaces, help to classify lesions as malignant. This visual assessment is repeated on numerous slides taken at various sections through the resected tumor, each at different magnifications. Computer vision models have been proposed to assist human pathologists in classification tasks such as these. Using MobileNetV3, a convolutional architecture designed to achieve high accuracy with a compact parameter footprint, we attempted to classify breast cancer images in the BreakHis_v1 breast pathology dataset to determine the performance of this model out-of-the-box. Using transfer learning to take advantage of ImageNet embeddings without special feature extraction, we were able to correctly classify histopathology images broadly as benign or malignant with 0.98 precision, 0.97 recall, and an F1 score of 0.98. The ability to classify into histological subcategories was varied, with the greatest success being with classifying ductal carcinoma (accuracy 0.95), and the lowest success being with lobular carcinoma (accuracy 0.59). Multiclass ROC assessment of performance as a multiclass classifier yielded AUC values ≥0.97 in both benign and malignant subsets. In comparison with previous efforts, using older and larger convolutional network architectures with feature extraction pre-processing, our work highlights that modern, resource-efficient architectures can classify histopathological images with accuracy that at least matches that of previous efforts, without the need for labor-intensive feature extraction protocols. Suggestions to further refine the model are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.