Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38706395›Full record

ArticleAge and ageing2024

How do primary care clinicians approach the management of frailty? A qualitative interview study.

Anna Seeley, Margaret Glogowska, Gail Hayward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Age and ageing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna SeeleyNuffield Department of Primary Care and Health Sciences, University of Oxford.
Margaret GlogowskaNuffield Department of Primary Care and Health Sciences, University of Oxford.
Gail HaywardNuffield Department of Primary Care and Health Sciences, University of Oxford.

Funding

NIHR Academic Clinical Fellowship ACF-2019-13-009NIHR Advanced FellowshipNIHR Community Healthcare MedTechOxford Health NHS Foundation TrustOxfordshire Health Services Research CommitteeRoyal College of General Practitioners Scientific Foundation Board
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAround 15% of adults aged over 65 live with moderate or severe frailty. Contractual requirements for management of frailty are minimal and neither incentivised nor reinforced. Previous research has shown frailty identification in primary care is ad hoc and opportunistic, but there has been little focus on the challenges of frailty management, particularly within the context of recent introduction of primary care networks and an expanding allied health professional workforce.

aimExplore the views of primary care clinicians in England on the management of frailty. DESIGN AND

settingSemi-structured interviews were conducted with clinicians across England, including general practitioners (GPs), physician associates, nurse practitioners, paramedics and clinical pharmacists. Thematic analysis was facilitated through NVivo (Version 12).

resultsA total of 31 clinicians participated. Frailty management was viewed as complex and outside of clinical guidelines with medication optimisation highlighted as a key example. Senior clinicians, particularly experienced GPs, were more comfortable with managing risk. Relational care was important in prioritising patient wishes and autonomy, for instance to remain at home despite deteriorations in health. In settings where more formalised multidisciplinary frailty services had been established this was viewed as successful by clinicians involved.

conclusionPrimary care clinicians perceive frailty as best managed through trusted relationships with patients, and with support from experienced clinicians. New multidisciplinary working in primary care could enhance frailty services, but must keep continuity in mind. There is a lack of evidence or guidance for specific interventions or management approaches.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelFrail ElderlyFrailtyInterviews as TopicPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchAgedEnglandFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMalefrailtymanagementolder peopleprimary carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID38706395
PMCPMC11070720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.