Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38706384›Full record

Trial reportInfluenza and other respiratory viruses2024

Comparative Effectiveness of Baloxavir Marboxil and Oseltamivir Treatment in Reducing Household Transmission of Influenza: A Post Hoc Analysis of the BLOCKSTONE Trial.

Hideyuki Ikematsu, Takamichi Baba, Masaya M Saito, Masahiro Kinoshita, Shogo Miyazawa, Ayano Hata, Saki Nakano, Yoshitake Kitanishi, Frederick G Hayden

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Influenza and other respiratory viruses, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Baloxavir Treatment to Reduce Influenza Virus Transmission.The New England journal of medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hideyuki IkematsuRicerca Clinica, Fukuoka, Japan.
Takamichi BabaBiostatistics Center, Shionogi & Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4968-2642
Masaya M SaitoDepartment of Information Security, University of Nagasaki, Nagasaki, Japan.
Masahiro KinoshitaMedical Affairs Department, Shionogi & Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
Shogo MiyazawaData Science Department, Shionogi & Co, Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
Ayano HataData Science Department, Shionogi & Co, Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
Saki NakanoData Science Department, Shionogi & Co, Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshitake KitanishiData Science Department, Shionogi & Co, Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
Frederick G HaydenDivision of Infectious Diseases and International Health, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Virginia, USA.

Funding

Shionogi & Co., Ltd
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe transmission of influenza virus in households, especially by children, is a major route of infection. Prior studies suggest that timely antiviral treatment of ill cases may reduce infection in household contacts. The aim of the study was to compare the effects of oseltamivir (OTV) and baloxavir marboxil (BXM) treatment of index cases on the secondary attack rate (SAR) of influenza within household.

methodsA post hoc analysis was done in BLOCKSTONE trial-a placebo-controlled, double-blinded post-exposure prophylaxis of BXM. Data were derived from the laboratory-confirmed index cases' household contacts who received placebo in the trial and also from household members who did not participate in the trial but completed illness questionnaires. To assess the SAR of household members, multivariate analyses adjusted for factors including age, vaccination status, and household size were performed and compared between contacts of index cases treated with BXM or OTV.

resultsIn total, 185 index cases (116 treated with BXM and 69 treated with OTV) and 410 household contacts (201 from trial, 209 by questionnaire) were included. The Poisson regression modeling showed that the SAR in household contacts of index cases treated with BXM and OTV was 10.8% and 18.5%, respectively; the adjusted relative reduction in SAR was 41.8% (95% confidence interval: 1.0%-65.7%, p = 0.0456) greater with BXM than OTV. Similar reductions were found in contacts from the trial and those included by questionnaire.

conclusionBXM treatment of index cases appeared to result in a greater reduction in secondary household transmission than OTV treatment.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsDibenzothiepinsFamily CharacteristicsInfluenza, HumanMorpholinesOseltamivirPost-Exposure ProphylaxisPyridonesTriazinesAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolDouble-Blind MethodFemaleAntiviral AgentsbaloxavirDibenzothiepinsMorpholinesOseltamivirOxazinesPyridinesPyridonesThiepinsTriazinesbaloxavir marboxilhousehold transmissioninfluenza treatmentJapanoseltamivir

Identifiers

PMID38706384
PMCPMC11070769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.