ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Assessing computational predictions of antimicrobial resistance phenotypes from microbial genomes.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Computational paradigms for antimicrobial resistance prediction: integrating multi-omics, structural modeling, and foundation artificial intelligence systems.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative whole genome analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated from BPaLM and individualized regimen treated patients at Dr. Soetomo Hospital, Indonesia.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Application of antibiotics for the selective isolation of previously uncultured species from activated sludge.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Isolation, Identification, and Biological Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Uncovering species- and drug-class-specific antimicrobial resistance mechanisms from large-scale whole-genome sequencing data using discordance analysis and machine learning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Improving the Precision of Etiological Diagnosis in Bacterial Infections Using Molecular Technologies: A Comparative Analysis of Platforms, AI Integration, and Point-of-Care Deployment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for antimicrobial resistance: advancing reproducibility, interpretability, and clinical deployment.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- AMR-GNN: a multi-representation graph neural network framework to enable genomic antimicrobial resistance prediction.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Structural modeling and docking analysis of canonical and novel resistance-associated missense mutations in Sudanese Escherichia coli.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial resistance databases: opportunities and challenges for public health.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2026Review
- Harnessing interpretable deep learning to predict resistance inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- A comparative analysis of graph neural networks and classical machine learning for carbapenem-resistance prediction and genomic interpretation inFrontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Review
- Diversity and functional genomic insights into antimicrobial resistance and aromatic hydrocarbon degradation genes in the Red Sea coast microbial community.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Predicting clinical outcome ofMicrobial genomics · 2025Article
- Biased sampling driven by bacterial population structure confounds machine learning prediction of antimicrobial resistance.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Data limitations hinder the development of AI-based decision support for the treatment of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.Future microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Metagenomic sequencing of mpox virus clade Ib lesions identifies possible bacterial and viral co-infections in hospitalized patients in eastern DRC.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Whole-genome phenotype prediction with machine learning: open problems in bacterial genomics.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The advent of rapid whole-genome sequencing has created new opportunities for computational prediction of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) phenotypes from genomic data. Both rule-based and machine learning (ML) approaches have been explored for this task, but systematic benchmarking is still needed. Here, we evaluated four state-of-the-art ML methods (Kover, PhenotypeSeeker, Seq2Geno2Pheno and Aytan-Aktug), an ML baseline and the rule-based ResFinder by training and testing each of them across 78 species-antibiotic datasets, using a rigorous benchmarking workflow that integrates three evaluation approaches, each paired with three distinct sample splitting methods. Our analysis revealed considerable variation in the performance across techniques and datasets. Whereas ML methods generally excelled for closely related strains, ResFinder excelled for handling divergent genomes. Overall, Kover most frequently ranked top among the ML approaches, followed by PhenotypeSeeker and Seq2Geno2Pheno. AMR phenotypes for antibiotic classes such as macrolides and sulfonamides were predicted with the highest accuracies. The quality of predictions varied substantially across species-antibiotic combinations, particularly for beta-lactams; across species, resistance phenotyping of the beta-lactams compound, aztreonam, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefoxitin, ceftazidime and piperacillin/tazobactam, alongside tetracyclines demonstrated more variable performance than the other benchmarked antibiotics. By organism, Campylobacter jejuni and Enterococcus faecium phenotypes were more robustly predicted than those of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella enterica, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In addition, our study provides software recommendations for each species-antibiotic combination. It furthermore highlights the need for optimization for robust clinical applications, particularly for strains that diverge substantially from those used for training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.