Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38706178›Full record

ArticleThe Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology2024

Research priorities of endometriosis patients and supporters in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Katherine Ellis, Rachael Wood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katherine EllisDepartment of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3501-582X
Rachael WoodDepartment of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn New Zealand, an estimated 10% of women and people presumed female at birth have endometriosis, a disease characterised by the presence of tissue similar to the lining of the uterus, outside of the uterus.

aimsThe purpose of this study was to characterise the research priorities of New Zealand endometriosis patients and their support networks in alignment with an Australian study. This will allow researchers to be able to ensure their research aligns with closing research gaps prioritised by those who directly experience the impacts of the disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS: There were 1262 responses to an online Qualtrics survey advertised through Endometriosis New Zealand's social media accounts and mailing list to reach endometriosis patients and their support networks.

resultsOverall, the highest research priorities for surgically or radiologically confirmed endometriosis patients, clinically suspected endometriosis patients, chronic pelvic pain patients, and their parents, partners, family members and friends were the management and treatment of endometriosis, followed by understanding endometriosis' cause, and improved capacity to diagnose endometriosis earlier. The key differences between the priorities of symptomatic participants and supporters were that symptomatic participants placed a significantly higher priority on understanding the cause of endometriosis, and supporters placed a significantly higher priority on improving the diagnosis of endometriosis.

conclusionsThere is alignment between the ranking of general research priority areas for endometriosis in Australasia, allowing for clear priorities for future research teams to structure their work around patient-centredness.

Indexed as

EndometriosisPelvic PainAdultBiomedical ResearchFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNew ZealandResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultchronic painendometriosisNew Zealandpatient prioritiesresearch priorities

Identifiers

PMID38706178
PMCPMC11683752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.