ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2024
Hyper-Selective Posterior Fusion is Recommended When the Modified S-Line is Positive in Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePostoperative coronal decompensation and less fusion level are dilemmas and the proper selective posterior fusion (SPF) strategy should be investigated. We proposed a parameter, modified S-line, and aimed to investigate if the modified S-line could predict postoperative coronal decompensation in patients with Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
methodsThis is a retrospective radiographic study and Lenke 5C AIS patients undergoing SPF during the period from September 2017 to June 2021 were included. The modified S-line was defined as the line linking the centers of the concave-side pedicles of the upper end vertebra (UEV) and lower end vertebra (LEV) at baseline. A modified S-line tilt to the right is established as modified S-line+ (UEV being to the right of the LEV). The patients were further categorized into two groups: the Cobb to Cobb fusion group and the Cobb-1 to Cobb fusion group. Outcomes including thoracic Cobb angle, TL/L Cobb angle, coronal balance, upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) translation, lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) translation, UIV tilt, LIV tilt, LIV disc angle, thoracic apical vertebral translation, lumbar apical vertebral translation (L-AVT), L-T AVT ratio, L-T Cobb were measured at baseline, immediately after surgery, and the last follow-up. Radiographic parameters and the incidence of both proximal and distal decompensation between the two groups were compared by chi-square test.
resultsAmong 92 patients, 48 were modified S-line+ and 44 were modified S-line-. Modified S-line+ status was identified as a risk factor for postoperative proximal decompensation (p = 0.005) during follow-up. In Cobb to Cobb group, a higher occurrence of proximal decompensation in individuals with modified S-line+ status (p = 0.001) was confirmed. Also, in the Cobb to Cobb group with baseline modified S-line+ status, patients presenting decompensation showed a significantly larger baseline of the UIV tilt and postoperative disc angle below the lower instrumented vertebra. However, In Cobb-1 group, the incidence of decompensation after surgery showed no association with baseline modified S-line tilt status (p = 0.815 and 0.540, respectively).
conclusionThe modified S-line could serve as an important parameter in surgical decision-making for Lenke 5C AIS patients. Cobb to Cobb SPF is not recommended with a modified S-line+ status, and the Cobb-1 to Cobb fusion may serve as a potential alternative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.