ArticleThoracic research and practice2024
Relative Value of Immunohistochemistry in Detection of Mycobacterial Antigen in Suspected Cases of Tuberculosis in Tissue Section.
Article in Thoracic research and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDue to its infectious nature, complex immunological response, chronic progression, and the necessity for long-term treatment, tuberculosis has always been a major health burden. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has the capacity to highlight the occurrence of mycobacterial antigens for tissue diagnosis. This study was conducted to understand the advantage of immunostaining over culture of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. MATERIAL AND
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on 30 samples of suspected cases of tuberculosis. Specimens received were fixed in 10% formalin and processed; 3-5 µm thick sections were made from paraffin block, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, Ziehl–Neelsen stain, and immunohistochemistry. Culture was done using Lowenstein–Jensen medium. Immunohistochemistry was interpreted as fine granular brownish cytoplasmic, coarse granular brownish cytoplasmic, and bacillus staining.
resultsOut of the 30 samples studied, 12 (40.0%) were culture positive while 20 (66.7%) of them were IHC positive. Immunohistochemistry showed 17 granulomatous lesions of which 11 (55.0%) were well-formed granulomas. The sensitivity and negative predictive value were found to be high with immunohistochemistry, while specificity and positive predictive value were found to be on the lower side. Among the 20 positive IHC cases, the degree of staining was fine granular cytoplasmic staining in 13 cases (65.0%) and coarse granular staining in 7 cases (35.0%).
conclusionImmunohistochemistry is a reliable test with high sensitivity as well as high negative predictive value which can be done rapidly for establishing an etiological diagnosis of tuberculosis in histologic specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.