Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38705962›Full record

ArticleOdontology2025

Evaluation of early bacterial adhesion on CAD/CAM dental materials: an in situ study.

Stefan Vulović, Aleksandar Todorović, Boško Toljić, Nataša Nikolić-Jakoba, Tamara Vlajić Tovilović, Aleksandra Milić-Lemić

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Odontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stefan VulovićDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia. stefan.vulovic@stomf.bg.ac.rs.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2007-8852
Aleksandar TodorovićDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0421-0198
Boško ToljićDepartment of Human Genetics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6664-2829
Nataša Nikolić-JakobaDepartment of Periodontology and Oral Medicine, School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8418-2395
Tamara Vlajić TovilovićDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3606-9646
Aleksandra Milić-LemićDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1549-7748

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this research was to determine if there are differences in early bacterial adhesion among CAD/CAM dental materials after 24 h exposure in the oral environment. One hundred twenty specimens were prepared according to the manufacturer's recommendations and divided into six groups: RBC (resin-based composite), PMMA (polymethyl methacrylate), PEEK (polyether ether ketone), ZP (zirconia polished), ZG (zirconia glazed), and cobalt-chromium alloy (CoCr alloy). Twenty healthy participants were instructed to carry an intraoral device with six specimens, one per group, for 24 h. Thereafter, real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses enabled quantification and 2D view of biofilm formed on the specimens' surfaces. Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's post hoc analysis were used for inter-group comparison and data were presented as median (minimum-maximum). RBC specimens accumulated less bacteria, in comparison with ZG (p = 0.017) and PEEK specimens (p = 0.030), that dominated with the highest amount of adhered bacterial biofilm. PMMA, CoCr, and ZP specimens adhered more bacteria than RBC (p > 0.05), and less than ZG (p > 0.05) and PEEK (p > 0.05). The bacterial number varied considerably among participants. The obtained results enable a closer view into the susceptibility of CAD/CAM materials to microorganisms during the presence in the oral environment, which can be beneficial for a proper selection of these materials for a variety of dental restorations.

Indexed as

Bacterial AdhesionBenzophenonesComposite ResinsComputer-Aided DesignDental MaterialsMaterials TestingMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningPolymersPolymethyl MethacrylateSurface PropertiesAcrylic ResinsAdultBiofilmsChromium AlloysFemaleHumansAcrylic ResinsBenzophenonesChromium AlloysComposite Dental ResinComposite ResinsDental MaterialsKetonespolyetheretherketonePolyethylene GlycolsPolymersPolymethyl MethacrylatePolyurethanesZirconiumzirconium oxideBiofilm formationCAD/CAM dental materialsIn situReal-time PCRScanning electron microscopy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.