Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38705914›Full record

ArticleProgress in orthodontics2024

Perceptions and utilization of tele-orthodontics: a survey of the members of the American Association of Orthodontists.

Sarah Abu Arqub, Dalya Al-Moghrabi, Chia-Ling Kuo, Lucas Da Cunha Godoy, Flavio Uribe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in orthodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah Abu ArqubDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. sabuarqub@ufl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0090-4037
Dalya Al-MoghrabiDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Chia-Ling KuoConnecticut Convergence Institute for Translation in Regenerative Engineering, UConn Health, Farmington, CT, USA.
Lucas Da Cunha GodoyConnecticut Convergence Institute for Translation in Regenerative Engineering, UConn Health, Farmington, CT, USA.
Flavio UribeDivision of Orthodontics, Department of Craniofacial Sciences, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, CT, USA.

Funding

Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University PNURSP2024R88
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate orthodontists' utilization and perceptions of tele-orthodontics. MATERIALS AND

methodsA 30-item online survey was distributed to members of the American Association of Orthodontists (AAO). The questionnaire encompassed topics concerning the orthodontists' utilization, perceptions, clinical applications, limitations, and concerns regarding tele-orthodontics. Descriptive statistics were employed, and comparisons between responses from users and non-users were conducted  using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and Fisher's exact tests.

results152 members completed the survey, (response rate: 2.4%). More than two third of respondents (69.74%) were users of tele-orthodontics. Users were more aligned with the belief that tele-orthodontics facilitates effective communication (mean ± standard deviation (SD) 4.06 ± 0.83 vs. 3.33 ± 0.94, p < 0.001). Both groups agreed on the requirement of patient fees for tele-orthodontic visits (mean ± SD: 3.62 ± 1.11 users vs. 3.74 ± 1.02 non-users, p = 0.659), and on the capability  of the system to reduce unwarranted referrals (p = 0.20). The majority of participants acknowledged  the utility of the system in monitoring aligners' patients (89% in users vs. 61% in non-users, p < 0.001). Non-users expressed greater concerns regarding privacy risks (mean ± SD: 3.06 ± 0.97 users vs. 3.57 ± 0.86 non-users, p = 0.002). Both groups stressed the significance of obtaining informed consent before utilizing tele-orthodontics.

conclusionsThe widespread acceptance of tele-orthodontics among AAO members was apparent, as demonstrated by their recognition of its effectiveness. There was notable variation in how users and non-users perceived tele-orthodontics. The study's results offer valuable insights into both the potential benefits and drawbacks of incorporating this technology into clinical practice from the clincians' perspective.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelOrthodonticsOrthodontistsTelemedicineAdultFemaleHumansMaleSocieties, DentalSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesApplicationsLimitationsPerceptionTele-orthodontics

Identifiers

PMID38705914
PMCPMC11070410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.