Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38705906›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

An improved manta ray foraging optimization algorithm.

Pengju Qu, Qingni Yuan, Feilong Du, Qingyang Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pengju QuKey Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing Technology of the Ministry of Education, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China.
Qingni YuanKey Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing Technology of the Ministry of Education, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China. qnyuan@gzu.edu.cn.
Feilong DuKey Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing Technology of the Ministry of Education, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China.
Qingyang GaoKey Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing Technology of the Ministry of Education, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China.

Funding

Guizhou Provincial Youth Science and Technology Talents Growth Project [2022] No.274National Natural Science Foundation of China 52065010Natural Science Foundation of Guizhou Province [2022] No. K024Natural Science Foundation of Guizhou Province [2023] No. G094Natural Science Foundation of Guizhou Province [2023] No. G125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Manta Ray Foraging Optimization Algorithm (MRFO) is a metaheuristic algorithm for solving real-world problems. However, MRFO suffers from slow convergence precision and is easily trapped in a local optimal. Hence, to overcome these deficiencies, this paper proposes an Improved MRFO algorithm (IMRFO) that employs Tent chaotic mapping, the bidirectional search strategy, and the Levy flight strategy. Among these strategies, Tent chaotic mapping distributes the manta ray more uniformly and improves the quality of the initial solution, while the bidirectional search strategy expands the search area. The Levy flight strategy strengthens the algorithm's ability to escape from local optimal. To verify IMRFO's performance, the algorithm is compared with 10 other algorithms on 23 benchmark functions, the CEC2017 and CEC2022 benchmark suites, and five engineering problems, with statistical analysis illustrating the superiority and significance of the difference between IMRFO and other algorithms. The results indicate that the IMRFO outperforms the competitor optimization algorithms.

Indexed as

Bidirectional search strategyImproved manta ray foraging optimizationLevy flightMetaheuristic

Identifiers

PMID38705906
PMCPMC11070432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.