Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38705195›Full record

ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2024

There and Back Again: A Forty-Year Perspective on Physician Nutrition Education.

Jaclyn Lewis Albin, Olivia W Thomas, Farshad Fani Marvasti, Jo Marie Reilly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Whole Food Plant-Based Nutrition Program for Medical Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Lifestyle Medicine in Medical Education: Maximizing Impact.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2024
    Article
  13. Prioritizing Nutrition in Medical Education-the Time Has Come.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Strengthening Primary Care Through Project ECHOJournal of primary care & community health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jaclyn Lewis AlbinDepartments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States. Electronic address: Jaclyn.albin@utsouthwestern.edu.
Olivia W ThomasBoston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.
Farshad Fani MarvastiDepartment of Family, Community, and Preventive Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix and School of Nutritional Sciences and Wellness, College of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Jo Marie ReillyClinical Family Medicine and Population and Public Health, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical education faces an urgent need for evidence-based physician nutrition education. Since the publication of the 1985 National Academies report "Nutrition Education in the United States Medical Schools," little has changed. Although several key efforts sought to increase nutrition content in undergraduate medical education over the past 40 y, most medical schools still fail to include the recommended minimum of 25 h of nutrition training. Without foundational concepts of nutrition in undergraduate medical education, graduate medical education unsurprisingly falls short of meeting patient needs for nutritional guidance in clinical practice. Meanwhile, diet-sensitive chronic diseases continue to escalate, although largely preventable and treatable by nutritional therapies and dietary lifestyle changes. Fortunately, recent recognition and adoption of Food is Medicine programs across the country increasingly connect patients with healthy food resources and nutrition education as core to their medical care, and physicians must be equipped to lead these efforts alongside their dietitian colleagues. Filling the gap in nutrition training will require an innovative and interprofessional approach that pairs nutrition with personal wellness, interprofessional practice, and community service learning. The intersectional benefits of connecting these domains will help prepare future physicians to address the social, behavioral, and lifestyle determinants of health in a way that recognizes nourishing food access as a core part of clinical practice. There are numerous strategies to integrate nutrition into education pathways, including didactic and experiential learning. Culinary medicine, an evidence-based field combining the culinary arts with nutritional science and medicine, is 1 promising educational framework with a hands-on, interprofessional approach that emphasizes community engagement. Advancing the critical need for widespread adoption of nutrition education for physicians will require support and engagement across societal stakeholders, including co-leadership from registered dietitian nutritionists, health system and payor reform, and opportunities for clinical innovation that bring this essential field to frontline patient care.

Indexed as

Nutritional SciencesCurriculumEducation, MedicalEducation, Medical, UndergraduateHumansPhysiciansUnited Statesculinary medicinediet-sensitive diseasegraduate medical educationinterprofessionalnutrition educationundergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID38705195
PMCPMC11251405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.