Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38705186›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024

Towards acoustic monitoring of bees: wingbeat sounds are related to species and individual traits.

Alberto Rodríguez Ballesteros, Camille Desjonquères, Violeta Hevia, Marina García Llorente, Juan S Ulloa, Diego Llusia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Biodiversity isn't measured in tons: Making sense of nature in the context of sustainable agriculture.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Acoustic monitoring for tropical insect conservation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Emerging technologies in citizen science and potential for insect monitoring.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Towards a toolkit for global insect biodiversity monitoring.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Towards acoustic monitoring of bees: wingbeat sounds are related to species and individual traits.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alberto Rodríguez BallesterosTerrestrial Ecology Group, Departament of Ecology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Darwin 2, 28049, Madrid, Spain.
Camille DesjonquèresTerrestrial Ecology Group, Departament of Ecology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Darwin 2, 28049, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6150-3264
Violeta HeviaSocial-ecological Systems Laboratory, Department of Ecology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Darwin 2, 28049, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1623-4082
Marina García LlorenteSocial-ecological Systems Laboratory, Department of Ecology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Darwin 2, 28049, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3527-9318
Juan S UlloaInstituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Avenida Paseo Bolívar 16-20, Bogotá, 111711, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-5666-6942
Diego LlusiaTerrestrial Ecology Group, Departament of Ecology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Darwin 2, 28049, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5432-2716

Funding

Agencia Estatal de InvestigaciónEuropean Social Fund PlusMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spain)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global pollinator decline urgently requires effective methods to assess their trends, distribution and behaviour. Passive acoustics is a non-invasive and cost-efficient monitoring tool increasingly employed for monitoring animal communities. However, insect sounds remain highly unexplored, hindering the application of this technique for pollinators. To overcome this shortfall and support future developments, we recorded and characterized wingbeat sounds of a variety of Iberian domestic and wild bees and tested their relationship with taxonomic, morphological, behavioural and environmental traits at inter- and intra-specific levels. Using directional microphones and machine learning, we shed light on the acoustic signature of bee wingbeat sounds and their potential to be used for species identification and monitoring. Our results revealed that frequency of wingbeat sounds is negatively related with body size and environmental temperature (between-species analysis), while it is positively related with experimentally induced stress conditions (within-individual analysis). We also found a characteristic acoustic signature in the European honeybee that supported automated classification of this bee from a pool of wild bees, paving the way for passive acoustic monitoring of pollinators. Overall, these findings confirm that insect sounds during flight activity can provide insights on individual and species traits, and hence suggest novel and promising applications for this endangered animal group. This article is part of the theme issue 'Towards a toolkit for global insect biodiversity monitoring'.

Indexed as

AcousticsWings, AnimalAnimalsBeesFlight, AnimalPollinationSoundVocalization, Animalacoustic signaturebioacousticsbody sizefundamental frequencypollinatorsspecies classification

Identifiers

PMID38705186
PMCPMC11070252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.