Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38705141›Full record

ArticleOncology2024

Myocardial Infarction in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Results from the Nationwide Readmission Database.

Elrazi A Ali, Neel Patel, Mazin Khalid, Rasha Kaddoura, Madhumathi Kalavar, Jacob Shani, Mohamed Yassin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Vascular Toxicities of Cancer Therapies: 2025 Update.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elrazi A AliInterfaith Medical Center, One Brooklyn Health, New York, New York, USA.
Neel PatelMaimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
Mazin KhalidEngelwood Health, Englewood, New Jersey, USA.
Rasha KaddouraPharmacy Department, Heart Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Madhumathi KalavarInterfaith Medical Center, One Brooklyn Health, New York, New York, USA.
Jacob ShaniMaimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
Mohamed YassinHematology-BMT National Centre for Cancer Care and Research, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a hematological malignancy with an excellent prognostic outcome. After the advancements in CML treatment and the introduction of different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the life expectancy of CML patients has become equivalent to that of the general population. As a result, coronary artery disease is anticipated to be the leading cause of death among CML patients. Moreover, TKI use is associated with a risk of endothelial dysfunction, thrombosis, and cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction. In this study, we compare the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with CML to their matched non-CML counterparts.

methodThis is a retrospective cohort study using the Nationwide Readmission Database from January 2016 to December 2020. Adults with or without CML hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction and underwent PCI were included. The patients were identified using ICD-10 codes. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission rates. The secondary outcomes were PCI complications rates.

resultsOut of 2,727,619 patients with myocardial infarction, 2,124 CML patients were identified. A total of 888 CML patients underwent PCI. CML patients were significantly older (mean age: 68.34 ± 11.14 vs. 64.40 ± 12.61 years, p < 0.001) than non-CML patients without a difference in sex distribution. Hypertension (85.45% vs. 78.64%), diabetes (45.48% vs. 37.29), stroke (11.84% vs. 7.78) at baseline were significantly higher in the CML group. Prior myocardial infarction events (20.51% vs. 15.17%) and prior PCI procedure (24.47% vs. 16.89%) were significantly higher in the CML group. CML patients had a significantly longer hospital stay (4.66 ± 4.40 vs. 3.75 ± 4.62 days, p = 0.001). The primary outcomes did not differ between the comparison groups. The risk of post-PCI complications did not differ between the comparison groups in the propensity matched analysis except for coronary artery dissection (odds ratio [OR]: 0.10; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.02-0.65, p = 0.016) and ischemic stroke (OR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.14-0.93, p = 0.034) which were lower in the CML group.

conclusionThis analysis showed no statistically significant difference in mortality, 30-day readmission, and post PCI complications rates between CML and non-CML patients. However, interestingly, CML patients may experience lower coronary artery dissection and ischemic stroke events than those without CML diagnosis.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveMyocardial InfarctionPatient ReadmissionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionAgedFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAcute myocardial infarctionChronic myeloid leukemiaNon-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctionST-segment elevation myocardial infarctionTyrosine kinase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID38705141
PMCPMC11548094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.