Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38704856›Full record

ArticlePlant signaling & behavior2024

Investigation of

Xingyu Yan, Yongshun Liang, Felipe Yamashita, František Baluška

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant signaling & behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xingyu YanInstitute of Cellular and Molecular Botany, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Yongshun LiangInstitute of Cellular and Molecular Botany, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Felipe YamashitaInstitute of Cellular and Molecular Botany, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
František BaluškaInstitute of Cellular and Molecular Botany, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8763-7861

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants can activate protective and defense mechanisms under biotic and abiotic stresses. Their roots naturally grow in the soil, but when they encounter sunlight in the top-soil layers, they may move away from the light source to seek darkness. Here we investigate the skototropic behavior of roots, which promotes their fitness and survival. Glutamate-like receptors (GLRs) of plants play roles in sensing and responding to signals, but their role in root skototropism is not yet understood. Light-induced tropisms are known to be affected by auxin distribution, mainly determined by auxin efflux proteins (PIN proteins) at the root tip. However, the role of PIN proteins in root skototropism has not been investigated yet. To better understand root skototropism and its connection to the distance between roots and light, we established five distance settings between seedlings and darkness to investigate the variations in root bending tendencies. We compared differences in root skototropic behavior across different expression lines of

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsPlant RootsDarknessIndoleacetic AcidsLightSeedlingsArabidopsis ProteinsIndoleacetic AcidsAbiotic stressglutamate-like receptorlight conditionsPIN proteinsroot tropism

Identifiers

PMID38704856
PMCPMC11073417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.