Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38704799›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2024

A Pilot, Predictive Surveillance Model in Pharmacovigilance Using Machine Learning Approaches.

Rosa De Abreu Ferreira, Sheng Zhong, Charlotte Moureaud, Michelle T Le, Adrienne Rothstein, Xiaomeng Li, Li Wang, Meenal Patwardhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rosa De Abreu Ferreira *Medical Safety Evaluation, Pharmacovigilance and Patient Safety, Epidemiology, and Research and Development Quality Assurance, AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA.
Sheng Zhong *Statistical Sciences and Analytics, Data and Statistical Sciences, AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA.
Charlotte MoureaudSafety Data Sciences, Pharmacovigilance and Patient Safety, Epidemiology, and Research and Development Quality Assurance, AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA. charlotte.moureaud@abbvie.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9094-9230
Michelle T Le *Medication Safety Fellow, Purdue University College of Pharmacy, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Adrienne RothsteinMedical Safety Evaluation, Pharmacovigilance and Patient Safety, Epidemiology, and Research and Development Quality Assurance, AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA.
Xiaomeng LiStatistical Sciences and Analytics, Data and Statistical Sciences, AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA.
Li WangStatistical Sciences and Analytics, Data and Statistical Sciences, AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA.
Meenal PatwardhanMedical Safety Evaluation, Pharmacovigilance and Patient Safety, Epidemiology, and Research and Development Quality Assurance, AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe identification of a new adverse event (AE) caused by a drug product is one of the key activities in the pharmaceutical industry to ensure the safety profile of a drug product. Machine learning (ML) has the potential to assist with signal detection and supplement traditional pharmacovigilance (PV) surveillance methods. This pilot ML modeling study was designed to detect potential safety signals for two AbbVie products and test the model's capability of detecting safety signals earlier than humans.

methodsDrug X, a mature product with post-marketing data, and Drug Y, a recently approved drug in another therapeutic area, were selected. Gradient boosting-based ML approaches (e.g., XGBoost) were applied as the main modeling strategy.

resultsFor Drug X, eight true signals were present in the test set. Among 12 potential new signals generated, four were true signals with a 50.0% sensitivity rate and a 33.3% positive predictive value (PPV) rate. Among the remaining eight potential new signals, one was confirmed as a signal and detected six months earlier than humans. For Drug Y, nine true signals were present in the test set. Among 13 potential new signals generated, five were true signals with a 55.6% sensitivity rate and a 38.5% PPV rate. Among the remaining eight potential new signals, none were confirmed as true signals upon human review.

conclusionThis model demonstrated acceptable accuracy for safety signal detection and potential for earlier detection when compared to humans. Expert judgment, flexibility, and critical thinking are essential human skills required for the final, accurate assessment of adverse event cases.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPharmacovigilanceAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansPilot ProjectsAdverse drug reactionArtificial intelligenceMachine learningPharmacovigilanceSafety surveillanceSignal detectionSignal prediction

Identifiers

PMID38704799
PMCPMC11133112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.