ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024
Toward confident prostate cancer detection using ultrasound: a multi-center study.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Micro-Ultrasound in Prostate Cancer Detection.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- AI in High-Frequency Micro-Ultrasound: Advancing Prostate Imaging from Segmentation to Cancer Detection.Cancers · 2026Review
- Advancements in artificial intelligence for prostate cancer: Optimizing diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic assessment.Asian journal of urology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDeep learning-based analysis of micro-ultrasound images to detect cancerous lesions is a promising tool for improving prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis. An ideal model should confidently identify cancer while responding with appropriate uncertainty when presented with out-of-distribution inputs that arise during deployment due to imaging artifacts and the biological heterogeneity of patients and prostatic tissue.
methodsUsing micro-ultrasound data from 693 patients across 5 clinical centers who underwent micro-ultrasound guided prostate biopsy, we train and evaluate convolutional neural network models for PCa detection. To improve robustness to out-of-distribution inputs, we employ and comprehensively benchmark several state-of-the-art uncertainty estimation methods.
resultsPCa detection models achieve performance scores up to
conclusionDeep learning models have been developed to confidently detect PCa lesions from micro-ultrasound. The performance of these models, determined from a large and diverse dataset, is competitive with visual analysis of magnetic resonance imaging, the clinical benchmark to identify PCa lesions for targeted biopsy. Deep learning with micro-ultrasound should be further studied as an avenue for targeted prostate biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38704793What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.