Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38704771›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2024

Post-error adjustments occur in both reaching and grasping.

Joe Opdenaker, Jarrod Blinch, Miranda Scolari

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joe OpdenakerDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6051-107X
Jarrod BlinchDepartment of Kinesiology and Sports Management, Texas Tech University, Box 43011, Lubbock, TX, 79409,, USA. jarrod.blinch@ttu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4016-2832
Miranda ScolariDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3505-0318

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-error slowing (PES), the tendency to slow down a behavioral response after a previous error, has typically been investigated during simple cognitive tasks using response time as a measure of PES magnitude. More recently, PES was investigated during a single reach-to-grasp task to determine where post-error adjustments are employed in a more ecological setting. Kinematic analyses in the previous study detected PES during pre-movement planning and within the grasping component of movement execution. In the current study (N = 22), we increased the cognitive demands of a reach-to-grasp task by adding a choice between target and distractor locations to further explore PES, and other post-error adjustments, under different task conditions. We observed a significant main effect of task condition on overall reaction time (RT); however, it did not significantly impact PES or other post-error adjustments. Nonetheless, the results of this study suggest post-error adjustment is a flexible process that can be observed during pre-movement planning and within the onset and magnitude of the reaching component, as well as in the magnitudes of the grasping component. Considering the sum of the results in the context of existing literature, we conclude that the findings add support to a functional account of error reactivity, such that post-error adjustments are implemented intentionally to improve performance.

Indexed as

Hand StrengthPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleMotor ActivityMovementYoung AdultError reactivityKinematicsPost-error slowingReach-to-grasp

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.