ArticleBiophysical journal2024
A role for conformational changes in enzyme catalysis.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enzymatic Nanomotors Integrated with Plant Extracts: Biochemical Mechanisms, Applications, and Clinical Perspectives.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Conditions Enabling the Persistence of Cooperating Synthetase, Ligase, and Mutation-Inhibitor Catalytic Polymers.Journal of molecular evolution · 2026Article
- Enzyme Catalytic Parameters and Evolution Across the Dissipation Plane.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- Design principles, growth laws, and competition of minimal autocatalysts.Communications chemistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role played by conformational changes in enzyme catalysis is controversial. In addition to examining specific enzymes, studying formal models can help identify the conditions under which conformational changes promote catalysis. Here, we present a model demonstrating how conformational changes can break a generic trade-off due to the conflicting requirements of successive steps in catalytic cycles, namely high specificity for the transition state to accelerate the chemical transformation and low affinity for the products to favor their release. The mechanism by which the trade-off is broken is a transition between conformations with different affinities for the substrate. The role of the effector that induces the transition is played by a substrate "handle," a part of the substrate that is not chemically transformed but whose interaction with the enzyme is nevertheless essential to rapidly complete the catalytic cycle. A key element of the model is the formalization of the constraints causing the trade-off that the presence of multiple states breaks, which we attribute to the strong chemical similarity between successive reaction states-substrates, transition states, and products. For the sake of clarity, we present our model for irreversible one-step unimolecular reactions. In this context, we demonstrate how the different forms that chemical similarities between reaction states can take impose limits on the overall catalytic turnover. We first analyze catalysts without internal degrees of freedom and then show how two-state catalysts can overcome their limitations. Our results recapitulate previous proposals concerning the role of conformational changes and substrate handles in a formalism that makes explicit the constraints that elicit these features. In addition, our approach establishes links with studies in the field of heterogeneous catalysis, where the same trade-offs are observed and where overcoming them is a well-recognized challenge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.