Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38704606›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2024

Comprehensive characterization of stemness-related lncRNAs in triple-negative breast cancer identified a novel prognostic signature related to treatment outcomes, immune landscape analysis and therapeutic guidance: a silico analysis with in vivo experiments.

Min Zhang, Fangxu Zhang, Jianfeng Wang, Qian Liang, Weibing Zhou, Jian Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Min ZhangXiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 41000, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Fangxu ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, The Fourth People's Hospital of Jinan, Jinan, 250000, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Jianfeng WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 970 Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistic Support Force, Yantai, 264000, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Qian LiangDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
Weibing ZhouDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 41000, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Jian LiuDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, QingPu Branch of Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, 201700, People's Republic of China. Liujian_zZ@163.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2434-103X

Funding

Hospital-level Project of QingPu Branch of Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University (QYT2021-02)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer stem cells (CSCs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are known to play a crucial role in the growth, migration, recurrence, and drug resistance of tumor cells, particularly in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). This study aims to investigate stemness-related lncRNAs (SRlncRNAs) as potential prognostic indicators for TNBC patients.

methodsUtilizing RNA sequencing data and corresponding clinical information from the TCGA database, and employing Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) on TNBC mRNAsi sourced from an online database, stemness-related genes (SRGs) and SRlncRNAs were identified. A prognostic model was developed using univariate Cox and LASSO-Cox analysis based on SRlncRNAs. The performance of the model was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, ROC curves, and ROC-AUC. Additionally, the study delved into the underlying signaling pathways and immune status associated with the divergent prognoses of TNBC patients.

resultsThe research identified a signature of six SRlncRNAs (AC245100.6, LINC02511, AC092431.1, FRGCA, EMSLR, and MIR193BHG) for TNBC. Risk scores derived from this signature were found to correlate with the abundance of plasma cells. Furthermore, the nominated chemotherapy drugs for TNBC exhibited considerable variability between different risk score groups. RT-qPCR validation confirmed abnormal expression patterns of these SRlncRNAs in TNBC stem cells, affirming the potential of the SRlncRNAs signature as a prognostic biomarker.

conclusionThe identified signature not only demonstrates predictive power in terms of patient outcomes but also provides insights into the underlying biology, signaling pathways, and immune status associated with TNBC prognosis. The findings suggest the possibility of guiding personalized treatments, including immune checkpoint gene therapy and chemotherapy strategies, based on the risk scores derived from the SRlncRNA signature. Overall, this research contributes valuable knowledge towards advancing precision medicine in the context of TNBC.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticNeoplastic Stem CellsRNA, Long NoncodingTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksHumansImmunityKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorRNA, Long NoncodingCancer stem cellsImmune microenvironmentLncRNAsPersonalized treatmentPrognostic modelTriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID38704606
PMCPMC11070106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.