Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38704591›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2024

A modified CTAB method for the extraction of high-quality RNA from mono-and dicotyledonous plants rich in secondary metabolites.

Tibor Kiss, Zoltán Karácsony, Adrienn Gomba-Tóth, Kriszta Lilla Szabadi, Zsolt Spitzmüller, Júlia Hegyi-Kaló, Thomas Cels, Margot Otto, Richárd Golen, Ádám István Hegyi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Enhancing Cryopreservation Efficiency inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tibor KissFood and Wine Research Institute, Eszterházy Károly Catholic University, Eger, Hungary. kiss2.tibor@uni-eszterhazy.hu.
Zoltán KarácsonyFood and Wine Research Institute, Eszterházy Károly Catholic University, Eger, Hungary.
Adrienn Gomba-TóthFood and Wine Research Institute, Eszterházy Károly Catholic University, Eger, Hungary.
Kriszta Lilla SzabadiHUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Vácrátót, Hungary.
Zsolt SpitzmüllerFood and Wine Research Institute, Eszterházy Károly Catholic University, Eger, Hungary.
Júlia Hegyi-KalóFood and Wine Research Institute, Eszterházy Károly Catholic University, Eger, Hungary.
Thomas CelsFood and Wine Research Institute, Eszterházy Károly Catholic University, Eger, Hungary.
Margot OttoFood and Wine Research Institute, Eszterházy Károly Catholic University, Eger, Hungary.
Richárd GolenFood and Wine Research Institute, Eszterházy Károly Catholic University, Eger, Hungary.
Ádám István HegyiFood and Wine Research Institute, Eszterházy Károly Catholic University, Eger, Hungary.
József GemlHUN-REN-EKKE Lendület Environmental Microbiome Research Group, Hungarian Research Network and Eszterházy Károly Catholic University, Eger, Hungary.
Kálmán Zoltán VáczyFood and Wine Research Institute, Eszterházy Károly Catholic University, Eger, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-quality RNA extraction from woody plants is difficult because of the presence of polysaccharides and polyphenolics that bind or co-precipitate with the RNA. The CTAB (cetyl trimethylammonium bromide) based method is widely used for the isolation of nucleic acids from polysaccharide-rich plants. Despite the widespread use of the CTAB method, it is necessary to adapt it to particular plant species, tissues and organs. Here we described a simple and generalized method for RNA isolation from mature leaf tissues of several economically important woody (17) and herbaceous plants (2) rich in secondary metabolites. High yields were achieved from small amount (up to 50 mg) of plant material. Two main modifications were applied to the basic protocol: an increase in β-mercaptoethanol concentration (to 10%v/v) and the use of an effective DNase treatment. As opposed to similar studies, we tried to describe a more detailed protocol for isolating RNA, including the exact quantity and concentration of the reagents were used.

resultsOur modified CTAB method is proved to be efficient in extracting the total RNA from a broad range of woody and herbaceous species. The RNA yield was ranged from 2.37 to 91.33 µg/µl. The A

conclusionsOur RNA isolation method, with fine-tuned and detailed instructions, can produce high quality RNA from a small amount of starting plant material that is suitable for use in downstream transcriptional analyses. The use of an increased concentration of the reducing agent β-mercaptoethanol in the extraction buffer, as well as the application of DNaseI-treatment resulted in a method suitable for a wide range of plants without the need of further optimalization, especially in Rhus typhina (Staghorn sumac), for which molecular-genetic studies have not yet been sufficiently explored.

Indexed as

CTABPolysaccharide and polyphenolic rich plantsqRT-PCRRNA extraction

Identifiers

PMID38704591
PMCPMC11069240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.