Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38704501›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgical oncology2024

Efficacy and Safety of the Melphalan/Hepatic Delivery System in Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Results from an Open-Label, Single-Arm, Multicenter Phase 3 Study.

Jonathan S Zager, Marlana Orloff, Pier Francesco Ferrucci, Junsung Choi, David J Eschelman, Evan S Glazer, Aslam Ejaz, J Harrison Howard, Erika Richtig, Sebastian Ochsenreither and 16 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02678572 (A Single-arm, Multi-Center, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Melphalan/HDS Treatment in Patients With Hepatic-Dominant Ocular Melanoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02678572 phase3completednot on this map

A Single-arm, Multi-Center, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Melphalan/HDS Treatment in Patients With Hepatic-Dominant Ocular Melanoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorDelcath Systems Inc.Ran2016 to 2023Enrolled102ConditionsMelanoma, OcularArmsMelphalan/HDS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Management of liver metastases from uveal melanoma.The British journal of surgery · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Jonathan S ZagerDepartments of Cutaneous Oncology and Sarcoma, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA. Jonathan.Zager@moffitt.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6886-4468
Marlana OrloffThomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Pier Francesco FerrucciEuropean Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Junsung ChoiDepartments of Cutaneous Oncology and Sarcoma, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
David J EschelmanThomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Evan S GlazerThe University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Aslam EjazThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
J Harrison HowardUniversity of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
Erika RichtigMedical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Sebastian OchsenreitherCharité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berlin, Germany.
Sunil A ReddyStanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Michael C LoweEmory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Georgia M BeasleyDuke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Anja GesierichUniversity Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Armin BenderUniversity Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Martin GschnellUniversity Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Reinhard DummerUniversity Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Michel RivoireLéon Bérard Center, Lyon, France.
Ana AranceHospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Stephen William FenwickLiverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Joseph J SaccoThe Clatterbridge Cancer Center, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Sebastian HaferkampUniversity Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Carsten WeishauptUniversity Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Johnny JohnDelcath Systems, Inc., Queensbury, NY, USA.
Matthew WheaterUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Christian H OttensmeierLiverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUveal melanoma (UM) has a poor prognosis once liver metastases occur. The melphalan/Hepatic Delivery System (melphalan/HDS) is a drug/device combination used for liver-directed treatment of metastatic UM (mUM) patients. The purpose of the FOCUS study was to assess the efficacy and safety of melphalan/HDS in patients with unresectable mUM.

methodsEligible patients with mUM received treatment with melphalan (3.0 mg/kg ideal body weight) once every 6 to 8 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).

resultsThe study enrolled 102 patients with mUM. Treatment was attempted in 95 patients, and 91 patients received treatment. In the treated population (n = 91), the ORR was 36.3 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 26.44-47.01), including 7.7 % of patients with a complete response. Thus, the study met its primary end point because the lower bound of the 95 % CI for ORR exceeded the upper bound (8.3 %) from the benchmark meta-analysis. The median DOR was 14 months, and the median OS was 20.5 months, with an OS of 80 % at 1 year. The median PFS was 9 months, with a PFS of 65 % at 6 months. The most common serious treatment-emergent adverse events were thrombocytopenia (15.8 %) and neutropenia (10.5 %), treated mostly on an outpatient basis with observation. No treatment-related deaths were observed.

conclusionTreatment with melphalan/HDS provides a clinically meaningful response rate and demonstrates a favorable benefit-risk profile in patients with unresectable mUM (study funded by Delcath; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02678572; EudraCT no. 2015-000417-44).

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingLiver NeoplasmsMelanomaMelphalanUveal NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDrug Delivery SystemsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSurvival RateAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingMelphalan

Identifiers

PMID38704501
PMCPMC11249544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.