Trial reportAnnals of surgical oncology2024
Efficacy and Safety of the Melphalan/Hepatic Delivery System in Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Results from an Open-Label, Single-Arm, Multicenter Phase 3 Study.
Trial report in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02678572 (A Single-arm, Multi-Center, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Melphalan/HDS Treatment in Patients With Hepatic-Dominant Ocular Melanoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Single-arm, Multi-Center, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Melphalan/HDS Treatment in Patients With Hepatic-Dominant Ocular Melanoma
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Percutaneous Locoregional Therapies for the Treatment of Liver Metastases from Uveal Melanoma: A Systematic Review.Technology in cancer research & treatmentPooled it
- Subgroup analyses of the phase 3 FOCUS study of melphalan/hepatic delivery system in patients with unresectable metastatic uveal melanoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Trial
- Tebentafusp (IMCgp100), a first in class immune-mobilizing monoclonal T-cell receptors against cancer (ImmTAC) for HLA-A*02:01 positive uveal melanoma: Product review.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Review
- Acral lentiginous melanoma metastases to the vitreous masquerading as uveitis: A case report.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2026Article
- Tolerability and efficacy of chemosaturation in combination with systemic therapy for metastatic uveal melanoma.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Synergistic integration of regional and systemic therapies in uveal melanoma.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Article
- The Imipridone ONC206 Inhibits Tumor Growth and Improves Survival in Patient-Derived Xenograft Models of Uveal Melanoma.Cancers · 2026Article
- Yttrium-90 Radioembolization as a Safe and Effective Treatment Option for Hepatic Uveal Melanoma Metastases.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Characterization of long-term survivors with liver metastases from uveal melanoma diagnosed between 2005 and 2021.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Immunoembolization in liver-predominant metastatic uveal melanoma: a single-center retrospective analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Targeting liver metastases in uveal melanoma: ATX-LPA mediated immunosuppression and novel therapeutic approaches.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Multiple bilobar liver metastases from uveal melanoma: What is the limit for surgical resection?Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Aqueous humor biomarkers in ocular oncology: Insights and advances.Cell reports. Medicine · 2025Review
- Functions and clinical implications of the liver microenvironment in hepatic uveal melanoma metastases.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2025Review
- Response to Letter to the Editor Regarding: An Open-Label, Randomized Study of Melphalan/Hepatic Delivery System Versus Best Alternative Care in Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Uveal Melanoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- ASO Author Reflections: Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion with Melphalan/Hepatic Delivery System Versus Best Alternative Care for Patients with Metastatic Uveal Melanoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Management of liver metastases from uveal melanoma.The British journal of surgery · 2025Review
- State-of-the-art in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma Treatment: A 2025 Update : How to treat Metastatic Uveal Melanoma in 2025.Current oncology reports · 2025Review
- A Brief Overview of Uveal Melanoma Treatment Methods with a Focus on the Latest Advances.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUveal melanoma (UM) has a poor prognosis once liver metastases occur. The melphalan/Hepatic Delivery System (melphalan/HDS) is a drug/device combination used for liver-directed treatment of metastatic UM (mUM) patients. The purpose of the FOCUS study was to assess the efficacy and safety of melphalan/HDS in patients with unresectable mUM.
methodsEligible patients with mUM received treatment with melphalan (3.0 mg/kg ideal body weight) once every 6 to 8 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).
resultsThe study enrolled 102 patients with mUM. Treatment was attempted in 95 patients, and 91 patients received treatment. In the treated population (n = 91), the ORR was 36.3 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 26.44-47.01), including 7.7 % of patients with a complete response. Thus, the study met its primary end point because the lower bound of the 95 % CI for ORR exceeded the upper bound (8.3 %) from the benchmark meta-analysis. The median DOR was 14 months, and the median OS was 20.5 months, with an OS of 80 % at 1 year. The median PFS was 9 months, with a PFS of 65 % at 6 months. The most common serious treatment-emergent adverse events were thrombocytopenia (15.8 %) and neutropenia (10.5 %), treated mostly on an outpatient basis with observation. No treatment-related deaths were observed.
conclusionTreatment with melphalan/HDS provides a clinically meaningful response rate and demonstrates a favorable benefit-risk profile in patients with unresectable mUM (study funded by Delcath; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02678572; EudraCT no. 2015-000417-44).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.