Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38704404›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Blowflies are potential vector for avian influenza virus at enzootic area in Japan.

Ryosuke Fujita, Takuji Tachi, Masato Hino, Kosuke Nagata, Masahiro Saiki, Mizue Inumaru, Yukiko Higa, Kentaro Itokawa, Nozomi Uemura, Ryo Matsumura and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Three things we can do now to reduce the risk of avian influenza spillovers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Ryosuke FujitaLaboratory of Sanitary Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, West-5 543, Motooka 744, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka, 819-0395, Japan. r-fujita@agr.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
Takuji TachiBiosystematics Laboratory, Faculty of Social and Cultural Studies, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Masato HinoLaboratory of Sanitary Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, West-5 543, Motooka 744, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka, 819-0395, Japan.
Kosuke NagataLaboratory of Sanitary Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, West-5 543, Motooka 744, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka, 819-0395, Japan.
Masahiro SaikiLaboratory of Sanitary Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, West-5 543, Motooka 744, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka, 819-0395, Japan.
Mizue InumaruDepartment of Medical Entomology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukiko HigaDepartment of Medical Entomology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Kentaro ItokawaDepartment of Medical Entomology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Nozomi UemuraDepartment of Medical Entomology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryo MatsumuraDepartment of Medical Entomology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Izumi KaiDepartment of Medical Entomology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Kyoko SawabeDepartment of Medical Entomology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Mutsuo KobayashiDepartment of Medical Entomology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Haruhiko IsawaDepartment of Medical Entomology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro KusakabeLaboratory of Insect Genome Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kazunori MatsuoBiosystematics Laboratory, Faculty of Social and Cultural Studies, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Shinji KasaiDepartment of Medical Entomology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22K05679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI) poses a significant threat to both domestic and wild birds globally. The avian influenza virus, known for environmental contamination and subsequent oral infection in birds, necessitates careful consideration of alternative introduction routes during HPAI outbreaks. This study focuses on blowflies (genus Calliphora), in particular Calliphora nigribarbis, attracted to decaying animals and feces, which migrate to lowland areas of Japan from northern or mountainous regions in early winter, coinciding with HPAI season. Our investigation aims to delineate the role of blowflies as HPAI vectors by conducting a virus prevalence survey in a wild bird HPAI-enzootic area. In December 2022, 648 Calliphora nigribarbis were collected. Influenza virus RT-PCR testing identified 14 virus-positive samples (2.2% prevalence), with the highest occurrence observed near the crane colony (14.9%). Subtyping revealed the presence of H5N1 and HxN1 in some samples. Subsequent collections in December 2023 identified one HPAI virus-positive specimen from 608 collected flies in total, underscoring the potential involvement of blowflies in HPAI transmission. Our observations suggest C. nigribarbis may acquire the HPAI virus from deceased wild birds directly or from fecal materials from infected birds, highlighting the need to add blowflies as a target of HPAI vector control.

Indexed as

BirdsInfluenza in BirdsAnimalsCalliphoridaeFecesInfluenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeInsect VectorsJapan

Identifiers

PMID38704404
PMCPMC11069500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.