Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38703949›Full record

ArticleJournal of substance use and addiction treatment2024

Perceptions around medications for opioid use disorder among a diverse sample of U.S. adults.

Kaitlyn Jaffe, Stephanie Slat, Liying Chen, Colin Macleod, Amy Bohnert, Pooja Lagisetty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of substance use and addiction treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. From Control to Care: Reframing Medication Access Policies Through Public Health Ethics.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Examining Removal of Federal Waiver Restrictions to Prescribing Buprenorphine in Primary Care.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kaitlyn JaffeCenter for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Health Promotion and Policy, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.
Stephanie SlatDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Liying ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Colin MacleodDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Amy BohnertDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; VA Center for Clinical Management Research (CCMR), VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Pooja LagisettyDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; VA Center for Clinical Management Research (CCMR), VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: lagiset@med.umich.edu.

Funding

A Tailored Behavioral Intervention To Increase Engagement in Opioid Tapering in Primary Care SettingsK23DA047475 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LAGISETTY, POOJA · 2019 to 2023
$970k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA047475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMedications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) including methadone (MMT), buprenorphine (BUP), and naltrexone (NTX) are safe and effective. However, there are significant negative perceptions surrounding MOUD, creating barriers to uptake. While research on MOUD stigma has largely focused on provider and patient experiences, fewer studies have explored MOUD perceptions among the general public. Given that MOUD stigma expressed by social ties surrounding individuals with OUD can influence treatment choices, we assessed MOUD perceptions among U.S. adults to determine how beliefs impacted treatment preference. We further explored how MOUD perceptions may be amplified among racialized groups with histories of experiencing drug-related discrimination.

methodsThe study collected survey data from a diverse sample of U.S. adults (n = 1508) between October 2020 and January 2021. The survey measured knowledge of MOUD and non-medication treatments, relative agreement with common MOUD perceptions, and treatment preferences. Multinomial logistic regression analysis tested associations with treatment preference, stratified by race/ethnicity.

resultsDescriptive results indicated that across groups, many respondents (66.8 %) had knowledge of MOUD, but believed MOUD was a "substitute" for opioids and had some degree of concern about misuse. Multivariable results showed knowledge of non-medication treatments was positively associated with MOUD preference among White (MMT OR = 3.16, 95 % CI = 1.35-7.39; BUP OR = 2.69, CI = 1.11-6.47), Black (MMT OR = 3.91, CI = 1.58-9.69), and Latino/a (MMT OR = 5.12, CI = 1.99-13.2; BUP OR = 3.85, CI = 1.5-9.87; NTX OR = 4.51, CI = 1.44-14.06) respondents. Among White respondents, we identified positive associations between MOUD experience and buprenorphine preference (OR = 4.33, CI = 1.17-16.06); non-medication treatment experience and preference for buprenorphine (OR = 2.86, CI = 1.03-7.94) and naltrexone (OR = 3.17, CI = 1.08-9.28). Concerns around misuse of methadone were negatively associated with methadone preference among White (OR = 0.65, CI = 0.43-0.98) and Latino/a (OR = 0.49, CI = 0.34-0.7), and concerns around misuse of buprenorphine was negatively associated with preference for MOUD among White (MMT OR = 0.62, CI = 0.39-0.99; BUP OR = 0.48, CI = 0.3-0.77; NTX OR = 0.6, CI = 0.36-0.99) and Latino/a (BUP OR = 0.59, CI = 0.39-0.89) respondents.

conclusionsThis analysis offers critical insights into treatment perceptions beyond the patient population, finding that negative beliefs around MOUD are common and negatively associated with preferences for medication-based treatment. These findings highlight implications for public support of evidence-based treatment and lay the groundwork for future interventions addressing public stigma toward MOUD.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineMethadoneNaltrexoneOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersAdultAnalgesics, OpioidBlack or African AmericanEthnicityFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleMiddle AgedNarcotic AntagonistsAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineMethadoneNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsMedication perceptionsMedications for opioid use disorderOpioid use disorderPublic stigma

Identifiers

PMID38703949
PMCPMC11897984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.