ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2024
Progression or Aging? A Deep Learning Approach for Distinguishing Glaucoma Progression From Age-Related Changes in OCT Scans.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Glaucoma Detection and Progression.Advances in ophthalmology and optometry · 2026Article
- Performance of OCT-Based Artificial Intelligence Models for Detecting and Predicting Glaucoma Progression: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Automated cup-to-disc ratio quantification via color fundus photography for chronic glaucoma screening.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Augmented Decisions: AI-Enhanced Accuracy in Glaucoma Diagnosis and Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Glaucoma: Advances in Diagnosis, Progression Forecasting, and Surgical Outcome Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Deep Learning in Glaucoma Detection and Progression Prediction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Big data for imaging assessment in glaucoma.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop deep learning (DL) algorithm to detect glaucoma progression using optical coherence tomography (OCT) images, in the absence of a reference standard.
designRetrospective cohort study.
methodsGlaucomatous and healthy eyes with ≥5 reliable peripapillary OCT (Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering) circle scans were included. A weakly supervised time-series learning model, called noise positive-unlabeled (Noise-PU) DL was developed to classify whether sequences of OCT B-scans showed glaucoma progression. The model used 2 learning schemes, one to identify age-related changes by differentiating test sequences from glaucoma vs healthy eyes, and the other to identify test-retest variability based on scrambled OCTs of glaucoma eyes. Both models' bases were convolutional neural networks (CNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) networks which were combined to form a CNN-LSTM model. Model features were combined and jointly trained to identify glaucoma progression, accounting for age-related loss. The DL model's outcomes were compared with ordinary least squares (OLS) regression of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness over time, matched for specificity. The hit ratio was used as a proxy for sensitivity.
resultsEight thousand seven hundred eighty-five follow-up sequences of 5 consecutive OCT tests from 3253 eyes (1859 subjects) were included in the study. The mean follow-up time was 3.5 ± 1.6 years. In the test sample, the hit ratios of the DL and OLS methods were 0.498 (95%CI: 0.470-0.526) and 0.284 (95%CI: 0.258-0.309) respectively (P < .001) when the specificities were equalized to 95%.
conclusionA DL model was able to identify longitudinal glaucomatous structural changes in OCT B-scans using a surrogate reference standard for progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.