Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38703307›Full record

SynthesisClinical pharmacokinetics2024

Population Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Lidocaine in Adults: A Systematic Review.

Keng Wah Foong, Sook Hui Chaw, Yoke Lin Lo, Pui San Loh

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Pharmacokinetics of Intraperitoneal Lidocaine for Sustained Postoperative Analgesia in Adults.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2025
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Is there any effect of lidocaine on ischemia/reperfusion injury in testicular torsion? An experimental study.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Keng Wah FoongDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-3188-864X
Sook Hui ChawDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. sh_chaw@um.edu.my.ORCID 0000-0003-3886-6435
Yoke Lin LoDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, International Medical University, No. 126, Jalan Jalil Perkasa 19, Bukit Jalil, 57000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-5521-2543
Pui San LohDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-3819-1602

Funding

Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia FRGS/1/2020/SKK01/UM/02/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe establishment of optimal dosing regimens for intravenous (IV) lidocaine in the perioperative setting, aiming to balance effective pain relief with minimisation of potential side effects, is a topic of ongoing debate. This discussion stems from the significant variability in lidocaine's pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and its relatively narrow safety margin. Population pharmacokinetic (popPK) modelling has emerged as a valuable tool for understanding the factors contributing to this observed variability in drug kinetics.

objectivesThis systematic review compiles the existing knowledge on lidocaine's PK properties and published popPK models, with a focus on significant covariates.

methodsA systematic search on Cochrane CENTRAL, Medline, and EMBASE was performed from inception to June 2023. Original clinical studies that administered IV lidocaine to adults and performed PK analyses using a nonlinear mixed effects modelling approach were included. The quality of the included studies was assessed by compliance with the Clinical Pharmacokinetics (ClinPK) statement checklist.

resultsSeven studies were included, which involved a diverse adult population, including both volunteers and patients with various comorbidities. Lidocaine PK was primarily characterised by a two- or three-compartment model. The volume of distribution at steady state ranged from 66 to 194 L, and the total clearance ranged from 22 to 49 L/h. Despite adjusting for significant covariates like heart failure status, alpha-1-acid glycoprotein, duration of lidocaine infusion, and body weight, each study revealed substantial variability in PK parameters. The potential impact of hepatic or renal function biomarkers on these PK parameters calls for further investigation. Incomplete reporting of key aspects of developed models may hinder the models' reliability and clinical application.

conclusionThe findings emphasise the importance of tailoring drug dosage to ensure the safe and effective use of intravenous lidocaine. Optimal design methodologies may be incorporated for a more efficient identification of important covariates. Utilising contemporary model evaluation methods like visual predictive checks and bootstrapping would enhance the robustness of popPK models and the reliability of their predictions. This comprehensive review advances our understanding of lidocaine's pharmacokinetics and lays the groundwork for further research in this critical area of perioperative pain management. Review protocol registered on 25 August 2023 in PROSPERO (CRD42023441113). This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme, the Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia (FRGS/1/2020/SKK01/UM/02/2).

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAnesthetics, LocalLidocaineModels, BiologicalAdultHumansInfusions, IntravenousAnesthetics, LocalLidocaine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.