Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38703279›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2024

The effect of NHFOV on hemodynamics in mild and moderately preterm neonates: a randomized clinical trial.

Marwa Mohamed Farag, Mohamed Ahmed Amen Hassan, Nader Abd El Moneim Fasseeh, Hesham Abd El Rahim Ghazal

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05706428 (Cardiorespiratory Effects of Nasal High Frequency Ventilation in Moderate and Late Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05706428 nacompletednot on this map

Cardiorespiratory Effects of Nasal High Frequency Ventilation in Moderate and Late Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlexandria UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled100ConditionsVentilator Lung, Newborn, Hemodynamic Instability, EchocardiographyArmsNHFOV, NCPAP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marwa Mohamed FaragPediatric Department, Alexandria University Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt. d.marwa.farag@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0426-9018
Mohamed Ahmed Amen HassanPediatric Department, Alexandria University Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt.
Nader Abd El Moneim FasseehPediatric Department, Alexandria University Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt.
Hesham Abd El Rahim GhazalPediatric Department, Alexandria University Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to study cardio-respiratory effects of nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) vs. NCPAP as an initial mode of ventilation in moderate-late-preterm infants. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in NICU of Alexandria University Maternity Hospital (AUMH). One-hundred late-moderate-preterm infants were randomly assigned to either NHFOV-group (n = 50) or NCPAP-group (n = 50). For both groups, functional echocardiography was performed in the first 24 h to detect hemodynamic changes and respiratory outcome was monitored throughout the hospital stay. The main outcomes were hemodynamic measurements and myocardial function using functional echocardiography of those infants along with the respiratory outcome and complications. Kaplan-Meier survival plot was used representing time course of NCPAP and NHFOV failure. Left ventricular output values were not significantly different in both groups with median 202 ml/kg /min and IQR (176-275) in NCPAP-group and 226 ml/kg/min with IQR (181-286) in NHFOV group. Nevertheless, ejection fraction and fractional shortening were significantly higher in NHFOV-group with P 0.001. The time to weaning, the time to reach 30%-FIO2, the need for invasive ventilation, oxygen support duration, and maximal-FIO2 were significantly more in NCAPAP group.     Conclusion: NHFOV is an effective and promising tool of non-invasive-ventilation which can be used as a primary modality of respiratory support in preterm infants with variable forms of respiratory distress syndrome without causing detrimental effect on hemodynamics or significant respiratory complications.     Trial registration: NCT05706428 (registered on January 21, 2023). What is Known: • NHFOV might be beneficial as a secondary mode of ventilation and might have an impact on hemodynamics. What is New: • NHFOV can be used as an initial mode of ventilation with CDP beyond the reported pressure limits of CPAP without causing neither CO2 retention nor adverse hemodynamic consequences.

Indexed as

HemodynamicsHigh-Frequency VentilationInfant, PrematureEchocardiographyFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornTreatment OutcomeFunctional echocardiographyLung recruitmentNHFOVNon-invasive ventilationSVCF

Identifiers

PMID38703279
PMCPMC11263252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.